Skip to content

OSDOCS-10444: updated the offline deployments links in relnotes Micros… #75464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

aravipra
Copy link
Contributor

@aravipra aravipra commented May 2, 2024

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10444

Link to docs preview:
Embedding MicroShift containers for offline deployments

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 2, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 2, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10444 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10444

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 2, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 2, 2024

🤖 Fri May 10 09:38:34 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://75464--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-15-release-notes.html

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented May 2, 2024

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 2, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 2, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10444 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10444

Link to docs preview:
Embedding MicroShift containers for offline deployments

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 2, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 2, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added this to the Continuous Release milestone May 2, 2024
@dhensel-rh
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label May 9, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 9, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10444 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10444

Link to docs preview:
Embedding MicroShift containers for offline deployments

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 10, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 10, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 10, 2024

@aravipra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label May 10, 2024
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label May 10, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 10, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10444 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10444

Link to docs preview:
Embedding MicroShift containers for offline deployments

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels May 10, 2024
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 49af9bb into openshift:enterprise-4.15 May 10, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.15 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants