Skip to content

Remove daemonset from RBAC docs #7981

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2018
Merged

Remove daemonset from RBAC docs #7981

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2018

Conversation

enj
Copy link

@enj enj commented Mar 1, 2018

Users are given rights to daemonset by default in 3.9 so this section is not necessary.

/assign @ahardin-rh

Users are given rights to daemonset by default in 3.9 so this section is not necessary.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 1, 2018
@enj
Copy link
Author

enj commented Mar 1, 2018

@openshift/sig-security

@simo5
Copy link

simo5 commented Mar 1, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2018
@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh added this to the Future Release milestone Mar 1, 2018
@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thanks!
No revision history needed.

@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh merged commit b5fb311 into openshift:master Mar 1, 2018
@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-3.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ahardin-rh: new pull request created: #7982

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-3.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-3.9 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants