OSDOCS-13287: adds RHOAI to MicroShift

[ShaunaDiaz]

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13287

Link to docs preview:
microshift-rhoai

Reviews:

• QE has approved this change.
• SME has approved this change.

Additional information:
Release note PR, #91557
Install PR, #91558

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13287 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13287 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13287 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19

Issue:
OSDOCS-13287

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Apr 16 18:53:13 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://89987--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[skopacz1]

Left some comments, let me know if you have any questions. Otherwise LGTM, awesome work with such a huge PR and docs addition!

[ShaunaDiaz]

/retest

[ShaunaDiaz]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[ShaunaDiaz]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@ShaunaDiaz: #89987 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19":

Applying: OSDOCS-13287: adds RHOAI to MicroShift
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	_attributes/common-attributes.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging _attributes/common-attributes.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in _attributes/common-attributes.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-13287: adds RHOAI to MicroShift

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.