Skip to content

OSDOCS-13650-1: RPM typo update #91345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tedaveryredhat
Copy link

@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat commented Mar 31, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 31, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13650 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 31, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 31, 2025

🤖 Mon Mar 31 18:07:34 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://91345--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 31, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13650 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OSDOCS-13650

Link to docs preview:
https://91345--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat changed the title OSDOCS-13650-1: RPM typo update [WIP] OSDOCS-13650-1: RPM typo update Mar 31, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 31, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13650 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OSDOCS-13650

Link to docs preview:
https://91345--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

PTAL: @jogeo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jogeo
Copy link

jogeo commented Mar 31, 2025

LGTM from QE

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-13650 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OSDOCS-13650

Link to docs preview:
https://91345--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

PTAL: @jogeo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tedaveryredhat
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review needed

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz changed the title [WIP] OSDOCS-13650-1: RPM typo update OSDOCS-13650-1: RPM typo update Apr 7, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 7, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 7, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 7, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Apr 7, 2025
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 7, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2025
@tedaveryredhat
Copy link
Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Apr 7, 2025
@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/merge-review-in-progress

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 7, 2025
@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

I must be super tired, sorry - deleting all the cherry picks, as I see that it's only supposed to be merged to 4.14.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: base branch (enterprise-4.14) needs to differ from target branch (enterprise-4.14)

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #91790

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants