-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-3795: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880) #411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-3795: Order an operator CR's status.Component.Refs array (#2880) #411
Conversation
Problem: The operator CR's status includes a list of componenets owned by the operator. The list of components are ordered by GVK, but the order of objects with the same GVK may change. If an operator owns many components, there is a high likelyhood that OLM will continuously update the status of the operator CR because the order of its components have changed, Solution: Order an operators component references so OLM does not attempt to update the status of the operator CR. Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 793a7cc20d18f4907fc17ce2a0cebbca9a0f00be
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2556 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795. Retitling PR to link against new bug. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/retest |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3795 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.11 |
@awgreene: new pull request created: #413 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Upstream-repository: api Upstream-commit: 5d816f10a08ddd3a0cff2ee8662ad08ada786423
This is an automated cherry-pick of #406
/assign awgreene