Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve quota table sorting #1123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2017
Merged

Conversation

spadgett
Copy link
Member

Fixes #634

@spadgett spadgett requested a review from jwforres January 16, 2017 19:51
ng-if="resourceType !== 'resourcequotas'"
ng-class="{
warning: isAtLimit(quota, resourceType),
disabled: (quota.status.total.hard[resourceType] || specMax) === '0'
disabled: (quota.status.total.hard[resourceType] || quota.spec.total.hard[resourceType]) === '0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if this is replacing what was being set on specMax shouldnt it be quota.spec.quota.hard ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, will fix

@spadgett spadgett force-pushed the quota-page-sort branch 2 times, most recently from 820335e to 7082229 Compare January 16, 2017 20:14
@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

@jwforres updated

@jwforres
Copy link
Member

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for origin web console merge up to 7082229

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Jan 16, 2017

Origin Web Console Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_web_console/919/) (Base Commit: e9ab6af)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit a3da0ef into openshift:master Jan 16, 2017
@spadgett spadgett deleted the quota-page-sort branch January 16, 2017 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants