Skip to content

Fixed Cassandra icon style name #1486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jpkrohling
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jpkrohling jpkrohling requested a review from sg00dwin April 28, 2017 09:15
@@ -191,6 +191,6 @@
.icon-apache:before {
content: "\f138";
}
.icon-casadra:before {
.icon-casadra:before, .icon-cassandra:before {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth a comment here not to remove icon-casadra for backwards compatibility.

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jpkrohling

@sg00dwin Do you know if it would cause a problem for us to make the same change in openshift-logos-icon.json and openshift-logos-icon.svg?

@sg00dwin
Copy link
Member

sg00dwin commented May 1, 2017

@spadgett I believe it would be fine

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented May 2, 2017

[merge]

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented May 2, 2017

Merging since @sg00dwin made the other suggested change in #1496

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for origin web console merge up to d939ccf

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented May 2, 2017

Origin Web Console Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin_web_console/1308/) (Base Commit: 66df3b8)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 15d3a3d into openshift:master May 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants