Skip to content

Bug 1470010 - Use owner references to find deployment on replica set page #1832

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2017

Conversation

spadgett
Copy link
Member

  • Avoids a problem where the label selector from another deployment might match a replica set, showing the wrong deployment link on the browse replica set page.
  • Fixes a bug where an old replica set that becomes active while the user is on the page cannot be scaled. (This can happen if an old replica set revision is reused because it matches the current deployment spec.)

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470010

…page

- Avoids a problem where the label selector from another deployment
  might match a replica set, showing the wrong deployment link on the
  browse replica set page.
- Fixes a bug where an old replica set that becomes active while the
  user is on the page cannot be scaled. (This can happen if an old
  replica set revision is reused because it matches the current
  deployment spec.)

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470010
@spadgett spadgett added this to the 3.6.0 milestone Jul 12, 2017
@spadgett spadgett requested a review from jwforres July 12, 2017 13:15
@jwforres
Copy link
Member

[merge][severity:blocker]

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for origin web console merge up to 14f91eb

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Jul 12, 2017

Origin Web Console Merge Results: SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_origin_web_console/2/) (Base Commit: d4e91d8) (PR Branch Commit: 14f91eb) (Extended Tests: blocker)

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 569f20c into openshift:master Jul 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants