-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
fix: cache handling on update #604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e6c6b70
fix: cache handling on update
csviri 1e53eaa
fix: refining, namings etc
csviri 5a8fda7
fix: improvements and unit tests
csviri 2ea48e4
refactor: simplify filter creation
metacosm b20722b
refactor: simplify white listing filter by using concurrent hash map
metacosm 700b180
fix: typo
metacosm 04d8c09
fix: throw exception in case of missing custom resources
csviri a0ff4d5
fix: formatting
csviri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions
36
...vaoperatorsdk/operator/processing/event/internal/OnceWhitelistEventFilterEventFilter.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
package io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.event.internal; | ||
|
||
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap; | ||
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap; | ||
|
||
import org.slf4j.Logger; | ||
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; | ||
|
||
import io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.CustomResource; | ||
import io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.api.config.ControllerConfiguration; | ||
import io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.event.CustomResourceID; | ||
|
||
public class OnceWhitelistEventFilterEventFilter<T extends CustomResource<?, ?>> | ||
implements CustomResourceEventFilter<T> { | ||
|
||
private static final Logger log = | ||
LoggerFactory.getLogger(OnceWhitelistEventFilterEventFilter.class); | ||
|
||
private final ConcurrentMap<CustomResourceID, CustomResourceID> whiteList = | ||
new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public boolean acceptChange(ControllerConfiguration<T> configuration, T oldResource, | ||
T newResource) { | ||
CustomResourceID customResourceID = CustomResourceID.fromResource(newResource); | ||
boolean res = whiteList.remove(customResourceID, customResourceID); | ||
if (res) { | ||
log.debug("Accepting whitelisted event for CR id: {}", customResourceID); | ||
} | ||
return res; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public void whitelistNextEvent(CustomResourceID customResourceID) { | ||
whiteList.putIfAbsent(customResourceID, customResourceID); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like how we access an Optional without checking if it's present or not. If we never check for the presence, we might as well not use an Optional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is quite a gray are, because we are checking implicitly above. So returning when there was no execution:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not nice, but not sure how we could make it nicer.