Skip to content

Rename resolver/cache.Operator to Entry. #2359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2021
Merged

Rename resolver/cache.Operator to Entry. #2359

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2021

Conversation

benluddy
Copy link
Contributor

This type is a data object representing a resolver cache entry. It
doesn't have a particular connection to operators other than residing
where it resides. This name change should clarify what, exactly, the
type represents.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 15, 2021

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 15, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from ecordell September 15, 2021 21:16
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 15, 2021
@benluddy benluddy marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2021 21:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 15, 2021
njhale
njhale approved these changes Sep 20, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@njhale njhale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy, njhale

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

15 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@timflannagan
Copy link
Member

Known issue with the e2e tests that seems to be propping up more recently. Feel free to just manually squash merge this but holding so the bot doesn't go crazy.

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 22, 2021
@timflannagan timflannagan reopened this Sep 23, 2021
@benluddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

benluddy commented Oct 5, 2021

@timflannagan Does this need to be rebased in order to get the E2E check passing?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 5, 2021
@benluddy
Rename resolver/cache.Operator to Entry.
27ce072 
This type is a data object representing a resolver cache entry. It
doesn't have a particular connection to operators other than residing
where it resides. This name change should clarify what, exactly, the
type represents.

OperatorPredicate is also renamed to cache.Predicate because the
argument to its core Test method is a cache.Entry.

Signed-off-by: Ben Luddy <[email protected]>
@benluddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

benluddy commented Oct 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

#2092 x2

@njhale
Copy link
Member

njhale commented Oct 5, 2021

/hold cancel
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Oct 5, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5812e0b into operator-framework:master Oct 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@njhale njhale njhale approved these changes

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu Awaiting requested review from dinhxuanvu

@ecordell ecordell Awaiting requested review from ecordell

Assignees

@njhale njhale

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@benluddy @openshift-bot @timflannagan @njhale @openshift-merge-robot