-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' reorder output by index #57069
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for the report, confirmed on main. Further investigations and an PRs to fix are welcome! cc @lithomas1 |
take |
Hello, after finding a solution to this issue, I encountered a failing local test: "pytest pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_data_correctly_passed," which, if I undestood correctly, currently expects the results to be in the wrong order due to this bug.
It expects a dataframe in which index -1 corresponds to the value -4, index -2 to the value -3, and index -3 to the value -2. I believe the intended behavior would be index -1, value -2, index -2, value -3, and index -3, value -4. |
Agreed - I think this is saying the same, but I would think the expected here should be:
|
… the wrong order with non monotonically increasing indexes Fixed a bug that was returning the wrong order unless the index was monotonically increasing while utilizing DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' Fixed the test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_data_correctly_passed" to expect a result in the correct order Added a test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_order_consistency_preserved" to test DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' with a decreasing index Updated whatsnew to reflect changes
…order with non increasing indexes #57069 (#58030) * Fix #57069: DataFrameGroupBy.transform with numba returning the wrong order with non monotonically increasing indexes Fixed a bug that was returning the wrong order unless the index was monotonically increasing while utilizing DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' Fixed the test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_data_correctly_passed" to expect a result in the correct order Added a test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_order_consistency_preserved" to test DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' with a decreasing index Updated whatsnew to reflect changes * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]> * Fixed pre-commit requirements --------- Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]>
…order with non increasing indexes pandas-dev#57069 (pandas-dev#58030) * Fix pandas-dev#57069: DataFrameGroupBy.transform with numba returning the wrong order with non monotonically increasing indexes Fixed a bug that was returning the wrong order unless the index was monotonically increasing while utilizing DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' Fixed the test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_data_correctly_passed" to expect a result in the correct order Added a test "pandas/tests/groupby/transform/test_numba.py::test_index_order_consistency_preserved" to test DataFrameGroupBy.transform with engine='numba' with a decreasing index Updated whatsnew to reflect changes * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]> * Fixed pre-commit requirements --------- Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <[email protected]>
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
DataFrameGroupBy.transform
withengine='numba'
gives results that are ordered by the index values (and type has changed which is less important). This gives the wrong order unless the index is monotonically increasing. From what I can see we get the correctvalues
andindex
in thefoo
function (same ordering as the dataframe), but this are ordered by theindex
before concatenating the results to the final series. This differs from the behaviour when called withoutengine='numba'
(see below).Expected Behavior
The example above should produce the same results as
with output
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : f538741
python : 3.11.7.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Darwin
OS-release : 23.2.0
Version : Darwin Kernel Version 23.2.0: Wed Nov 15 21:53:18 PST 2023; root:xnu-10002.61.3~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000
machine : arm64
processor : arm
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 2.2.0
numpy : 1.26.3
pytz : 2023.3.post1
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 69.0.3
pip : 23.3.2
Cython : None
pytest : None
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : 8.20.0
pandas_datareader : None
adbc-driver-postgresql: None
adbc-driver-sqlite : None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
dataframe-api-compat : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numba : 0.58.1
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
python-calamine : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : 2023.4
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: