CLN: remove unused code check for pytest.raises

[simonjayhawkins]

xref #25866

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #26435 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26435      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.73%   91.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50741    50741              
==========================================
- Hits        46548    46544       -4     
- Misses       4193     4197       +4

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	90.23% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	41.68% <ø> (-0.12%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py	78.94% <0%> (-10.53%)	⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py	97.02% <0%> (-0.12%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1263e1a...98e7e6c. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #26435 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26435      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.73%   91.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50741    50741              
==========================================
- Hits        46548    46544       -4     
- Misses       4193     4197       +4

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	90.23% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	41.68% <ø> (-0.12%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py	78.94% <0%> (-10.53%)	⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py	97.02% <0%> (-0.12%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1263e1a...98e7e6c. Read the comment docs.

[jreback]

wait, shouldn't we just turn this check on?

[simonjayhawkins]

already turned on in another check. (it's a duplicate)

…

On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 13:47, Jeff Reback ***@***.***> wrote: wait, shouldn't we just turn this check on? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#26435?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADEMUXNXK2FBSCD5LCUX5FLPV2SPVA5CNFSM4HNQX7GKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVUU5VQ#issuecomment-493440726>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEMUXPNPXB4ZH7HOCTA7NLPV2SPVANCNFSM4HNQX7GA> .