-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Annotate DataFrame (Part 1) #26867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Annotate DataFrame (Part 1) #26867
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WillAyd some feedback.
I will annotate these function in this PR. Functions after these are grouped using comments like, Rendering Methods
, IO methods
, etc. I will do one group of methods at a time after this.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #26867 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.88% 91.87% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 179 179
Lines 50696 50701 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 46581 46582 +1
- Misses 4115 4119 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #26867 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93% 93% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 182 182
Lines 50311 50316 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 46793 46794 +1
- Misses 3518 3522 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great on first pass!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think everything except type for data
is done.
Note to self: finish this. |
Hello @vaibhavhrt! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2019-09-12 15:57:32 UTC |
7189cd0
to
b405d2d
Compare
b405d2d
to
691d1bb
Compare
2762f54
to
9f72713
Compare
9f72713
to
0fd42eb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WillAyd some help
221294d
to
40001d6
Compare
@WillAyd tests are passing, u can review now |
lgtm. @WillAyd and @simonjayhawkins |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. a couple of suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm ex one comment
Co-Authored-By: Simon Hawkins <[email protected]>
@vaibhavhrt ci should be fixed. can you merge master. ping on green. |
@WillAyd ok to merge? |
Thanks @vaibhavhrt |
part 2 coming this weekend, this one took too long(3 months 😰 ), will try to speed up. |
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff