Skip to content

use stable httplug #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2016
Merged

Conversation

krichprollsch
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

"php-http/discovery": "~0.5"
"php-http/httplug": "^1.0",
"php-http/client-common": "^1.0",
"php-http/discovery": "^0.5"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be updated to 0.7

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated now

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

Thanks @krichprollsch . Can you please update discovery version as well?

@krichprollsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hum discovery 0.7 is depend of a beta version of puli/composer-plugin :/
WDYT @sagikazarmark ?

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

Yeah, these lines are missing from composer.json to allow that dependency:

https://github.com/php-http/guzzle6-adapter/blob/master/composer.json#L49-L50

@krichprollsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah, tests are green now, ty!

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

Thanks

sagikazarmark added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2016
@sagikazarmark sagikazarmark merged commit f718270 into php-http:master Feb 1, 2016
@krichprollsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sagikazarmark have you planned to create a tag ? I would like to update my deps...
Or you wait the stable release ?

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

I can tag an MJZ version if you would like. I would wait the stable release, until php-http/discovery#49 is resolved.

@krichprollsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will be very happy to have a tag yes :) ty!

@sagikazarmark
Copy link
Member

Tagged v0.2.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants