Skip to content

Ray cluster client redesign #65

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

sutaakar
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

What changes have been made

Rewritten NewRayClusterClient function to accept only RayClusterClientConfig with all the needed configuration.
RayClusterClientConfig allows users to pass http.Client with any configuration which user needs, providing configuration flexibility.
Simplified and adjusted client functions to better reflect underlying REST API.

Purpose is to make Ray client flexible enough to allow its usage outside of RHOAI, potentially donating it to Ray community.

Verification steps

Verified by using the new implementation in ODH/DW repo to run integration tests.

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@sutaakar sutaakar changed the title Ray cluster client creation redesign Ray cluster client redesign Sep 13, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: astefanutti, sutaakar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [astefanutti,sutaakar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2f60dc7 into project-codeflare:main Sep 13, 2024
3 checks passed
@sutaakar sutaakar deleted the ray-cluster branch September 13, 2024 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants