Skip to content

Get cluster #189

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

Get cluster #189

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

carsonmh
Copy link
Contributor

Feature #183

Makes function that returns Cluster object based on the cluster name and namespace
Tested using unit tests

@carsonmh carsonmh requested a review from Maxusmusti June 30, 2023 21:38
Copy link
Collaborator

@KPostOffice KPostOffice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just a couple of comments.

try:
config.load_kube_config()
api_instance = client.CustomObjectsApi()
rcs = api_instance.list_namespaced_custom_object(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@carsonmh carsonmh Jul 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@KPostOffice I get urllib3.exceptions.MaxRetryError: HTTPConnectionPool(host='localhost', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: /apis/ray.io/v1alpha1/namespaces/default/rayclusters/quicktest when calling the get_namespaced_custom_object so I think there is something wrong with this function

local_interactive=local_interactive,
)
return Cluster(cluster_config)
raise FileNotFoundError(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are able to use the function suggested above then the error handling can be removed here.

@carsonmh carsonmh requested a review from KPostOffice July 5, 2023 18:27
@jbusche
Copy link
Contributor

jbusche commented Jul 5, 2023

I tried it out on my OC 4.12 cluster and it's looked good - but Carson noticed a min/max workers aren't matching what was defined:
cluster.details() confirms 2/2 workers

 ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ 
 │   Name                                                         │ 
 │   mnisttest                                        Active ✅   │ 
 │                                                                │ 
 │   URI: ray://mnisttest-head-svc.default.svc:10001              │ 
 │                                                                │ 
 │   Dashboard🔗                                                  │ 
 │                                                                │ 
 │                      Cluster Resources                         │ 
 │   ╭─ Workers ──╮  ╭───────── Worker specs(each) ─────────╮     │ 
 │   │  Min  Max  │  │  Memory      CPU         GPU         │     │ 
 │   │            │  │                                      │     │ 
 │   │  2    2    │  │  2~2         2           0           │     │ 
 │   │            │  │                                      │     │ 
 │   ╰────────────╯  ╰──────────────────────────────────────╯     │ 
 ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

But the cluster.config is reporting just 1 each:

ClusterConfiguration(name='mnisttest', namespace='default', head_info=[], machine_types=[], min_cpus=2, max_cpus=2, min_worker=1, max_worker=1, min_memory=2, max_memory=2, gpu=0, template='/opt/app-root/src/codeflare-sdk/src/codeflare_sdk/templates/base-template.yaml', instascale=False, envs={}, image='ghcr.io/foundation-model-stack/base:ray2.1.0-py38-gpu-pytorch1.12.0cu116-20221213-193103', local_interactive=False)

Copy link
Contributor

@jbusche jbusche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Testing on my cluster, it looked good. Thanks Carson

@KPostOffice KPostOffice merged commit a8e9156 into project-codeflare:k8s-support Jul 6, 2023
Maxusmusti pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
* Add: get_cluster function to get cluster with specified name and namespace

* Test: make unit tests for get_cluster function
Maxusmusti pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2023
* Add: get_cluster function to get cluster with specified name and namespace

* Test: make unit tests for get_cluster function
Maxusmusti added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2023
* First pass on just the basics

* Added namespace retrieval and dashboard route access via kubernetes

* Added exception handling

* Remove unnecessary comment

* Change AW fs loading to k8s and begin converting unit tests

* Finished unit test update

* Update requirements

* Get cluster (#189)

* Add: get_cluster function to get cluster with specified name and namespace

* Test: make unit tests for get_cluster function

* Fix: unit test failing because of ray cluster obj changed (#208)

* Remove oc client and add helper functions (#187)

* Remove oc client and add helper functions

* Updates for error checking

* make sure tests run without oc login

* Removing CLI appwrapper generation

* Updated import

---------

Co-authored-by: Mustafa Eyceoz <[email protected]>

* Remove unused import

* Update authentication for K8s (#237)

* Updated authentication for Kubernetes

* Updated template name and comment

* Updated login functionality

* Altered config_check() function

* Altered comments and changed config_check() function

* Added logic for handling current namespace when a user authenticates via kube client

* Changed formatting

* Made handler functions generic and altered get_current_namespace() functionality

* Changed error message for cluster configuration

* Removed default values for token + server

* Added check for correct credentials

* Changed how using certs works with certifi.where

* Added unit tests for new authentication methods

* Fixed formatting and updated .gitignore to include test created files

* Fixed .gitignore

* Updated unit authentication tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Carson Harrell <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ted chang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark Campbell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants