-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
Possible MCAD issues on OC 4.13 #476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Do we know what images we are using for installs? for running tests we should be using images built from main branch |
Codeflare Operator 0.0.6 with the kfdef deploys
|
@jbusche For tests we should be using images compiled from the main branch. FYI here is one image that was compiled:
|
@tedhtchang created an IBM Cloud OpenShift 4.13 and I've installed the ODH 1.7.0 and CodeFlare 0.0.6 stacks on top of it. There isn't enough capacity to run the Ray batch job, but I was able to start up a tiny @asm582 this issue was created because there was some concern that the Codeflare 0.0.6 stack wouldn't run properly on OC 4.13. But Mustafa hasn't seen any problem on his cluster, and on IBM Cloud it looks good to me. Testing the newly built quota-management images using the |
I see, I don't have an issue. the task requirement is to test MCAD with images built from the main branch. I am running an image |
@jbusche For your test would it be possible to dump the definition of the app wrapper CRD. I am looking to see if these lines exist subresources:
status: {} |
I don't see this in GA release of CodeFlare (0.0.6 which has the mcad-controller:release-v1.32.0 version of MCAD, which gets installed with the kfdef deployment.) However, using @asm582's pr 475 and installed using the following commands:
and
Then I see the subresources entry: |
@jbusche I am closing this issue as we do not see the above problem, please feel free to reopen if the issue still persists. |
@asm582 was installing MCAD on an AWS OC 4.13 cluster and was seeing security errors.
https://project-codeflare.slack.com/archives/C04L7QH4Q84/p1688587042248109?thread_ts=1688585995.782689&cid=C04L7QH4Q84
@Maxusmusti mentioned that he was using it fine on his OC 4.13 cluster, and I tried it on a Fyre Cluster and the CodeFlare stack seemed to apply and install fine for me. (However, I am seeing trouble with a third-party storage solution, PortWorx, that I use for the codeflare notebook pvc).
@tedhtchang is going to provision an IBM Cloud OC 4.13 cluster (which has it's own IBM Gold storage) and we'll try it there, try to confirm the CodeFlare stack on OC 4.13.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: