Skip to content

improve PVSystem and associated object reprs #1031

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 25, 2020

Conversation

wholmgren
Copy link
Member

@wholmgren wholmgren commented Aug 25, 2020

  • Closes expand PVSystem repr #1027
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • Tests added
  • Updates entries to docs/sphinx/source/api.rst for API changes.
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

@wholmgren wholmgren added this to the 0.8.0 milestone Aug 25, 2020
@cwhanse
Copy link
Member

cwhanse commented Aug 25, 2020

LGTM pending resolution of that odd test failure for py3.5. Thanks @wholmgren

@wholmgren
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, dictionary order is not guaranteed until 3.6. I'll specify a dict with a single key.

@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ Enhancements
(:pull:`1017`)
* Add :py:func:`pvlib.inverter.fit_sandia` that fits the Sandia inverter model
to a set of inverter efficiency curves. (:pull:`1011`)
* Added *racking_model*, *module_type*, and *temperature_model_parameters* to
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*racking_model* renders as italics on RTD. Doesn't matter to me, just fyi if those were supposed to be inline literals (double backticks).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I intended for them to be italics but can change them if someone cares. I think too many inline literals make the whats new extremely hard to read.

@wholmgren wholmgren merged commit 87d1bf2 into pvlib:master Aug 25, 2020
@wholmgren wholmgren deleted the pvsystemrepr branch August 25, 2020 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

expand PVSystem repr
3 participants