-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
fix: Make non-embedded module clear their locals before deallocation #3798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
StarQTius
wants to merge
2
commits into
pybind:master
Choose a base branch
from
StarQTius:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+66
−27
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a little unclear if I understand this correctly. I'm wondering is
but all embedded modules share the same locals.
correct? If not I'm confused, if yes that would be my suggested wording.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry if it does not sound clear, English is not my native language. What I meant is that since the static local variable of
get_local_internals
does not get dynamically linked when a non-embedded module is loaded by the interpreter, you end up with one definition of the locals for the interpreter, and one definition for each non-embedded modules.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in that case my suggested wording is clearer. But I'm not a native speaker, too!
Let's see what @Skylion007 thinks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I'm having serious 2nd thoughts.
E.g. at Google, Python and all extension modules for a given binary (or test) are linked together statically. Each binary or test is hermetic.
Others may use
RTLD_GLOBAL
. Probably rare, but maybe in certain environment that's what's needed?What does this PR mean in those situations? I'm not sure. Does someone else have a clear understanding of how the
m_clear
functionality plays out across all environments?Guessing a lot: I think to be completely safe, we'd need some kind of lookup table, to keep track of which
module_def
pointers are associated with a givenlocal_internals
pointer, and if more than one, we cannot safelyclear_local_internals
until the last one disappears.Or we could have
static std::unordered_map<module_def *, local_internals>
with all the required logic to register & clear types given amodule_def
pointer, but search for types over all keys of the map.It seems pretty tricky to get the
m_clear
functionality correct in all environments.Given those uncertainties, and that pybind11 existed to this point without using
m_clear
, maybe this should be an opt-in, e.g. via some#define
, or runtime option? That would be a safer and less sudden way to find out what's possible and what not.