Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pint support for variables #3706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pint support for variables #3706
Changes from 17 commits
e5a6632
9414fe3
12d2fe4
077d67a
e03fac8
6b65a76
88320ef
1e07dce
3942193
ce572de
8bfc347
3d16f2e
a8cf968
9fdbd56
98e2b40
05946b1
8c490ee
f6eca88
72241e5
2ebfa6b
0a0c2d3
4cadc52
b51caa4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you flip the argument order rather than adding this? I’m a little puzzles here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the concern here is about consistency when applying
~
tobool
objects and boolean dtype arrays, explicitly callingnp.logical_not
is a good alternative.But it does feel a little weird to me to see this here. Maybe changing
duck_array_ops.notnull
would have the same effect?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same as the
fillna
issue above, in order to get the results in the units ofdata
, we need to flip the arguments and for that I need invert the mask (if there is a different way to flip the arguments without inverting, please do tell me).I tried to use
mask = ~mask
, but~
does not work as expected forbool
. I'll usenp.logical_not
instead.