Skip to content

Simplify code with a set comprehension. #183

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2022
Merged

Conversation

cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

@cclauss cclauss commented Aug 28, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #183 (b4b6777) into master (3d7aec1) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.04%   83.03%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        8869     8866       -3     
  Branches     1827     1827              
==========================================
- Hits         7365     7362       -3     
  Misses       1154     1154              
  Partials      350      350              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.16% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
distlib/markers.py 97.29% <100.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@pradyunsg pradyunsg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vsajip vsajip changed the title Simplify with set comprehension Simplify code with a set comprehension. Aug 29, 2022
@vsajip vsajip merged commit 2b33be1 into pypa:master Aug 29, 2022
@cclauss cclauss deleted the patch-1 branch August 29, 2022 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants