-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Always reinstall local distributions provided by the user #9147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
pradyunsg
merged 8 commits into
pypa:master
from
pradyunsg:reinstall-local-distributions
Nov 26, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ce46a5e
Re-install local candidates unconditionally
pradyunsg bb7fce7
Ensure we're not mishandling local indexes
pradyunsg d6e3643
Print a message and don't reinstall wheels
pradyunsg cd15a85
Factor out is_archive_file
pradyunsg 9add1c1
Add deprecation warning when reinstalling sdists
pradyunsg 5753884
Don't deprecate reinstalling from .zip files
pradyunsg 258242f
Remove test for not reinstalling wheels, as requested
pradyunsg b2785d8
Drop incorrect line from comment
pradyunsg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not related, but is this a bug? I thought editables are always reinstalled. (i.e. this should be true if
dist_is_editable(installed_dist) == candidate.is_editable == True
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No one's complained yet. And, we'd only hit this if someone tries to install an editable-over-already-installed-editable.
I'm fine with deferring this until someone complains.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd hate to be the one seen as complaining but reinstalling an already installed editable is a very common workflow, to make sure entrypoints are up-to-date. The fix looks easy enough. I'll look at writing a test for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#9116 seems to be along the same lines as well.