Skip to content

Fix SetupState breakage with upcoming pytest 6.3 #151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 15, 2021

Conversation

bluetech
Copy link
Member

pytest 6.3 makes some changes to the SetupState class, adjust to that.

@bluetech bluetech force-pushed the pytest63 branch 2 times, most recently from 381ada9 to 9582da1 Compare January 30, 2021 20:44
pytest 6.3 makes some changes to the SetupState class, adjust to that.
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ deps =
pytest54: pytest==5.4.*
pytest60: pytest==6.0.*
pytest61: pytest==6.1.*
pytest62: pytest==6.2.*
pytestmaster: git+https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest.git@master#egg=pytest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like testing against master.
This change should also be applied to .github/workflows/test.yml so CI runs them, too.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, added. Using master might of course cause breakage from the pytest side, but hopefully not.

Copy link
Contributor

@icemac icemac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR and improving the test setup for this plug-in.
I like it.

Copy link
Member

@sallner sallner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the changes, too.

@icemac icemac merged commit c555b12 into pytest-dev:master Feb 15, 2021
@icemac
Copy link
Contributor

icemac commented Feb 15, 2021

Thank you for this PR and the review. 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants