issue469: junit parsing nodeid, add method test

[tomviner]

Additional test as recommend before #1431 was merged :-)

Also added name to the changelog entry. And repositioned the rst link definition.

While I'm here couple comments on the changelog:

• we're in risk of the (#469_) numbers referencing both issues and pull requests clashing (both are up to around 1400 now). Obviously all links are explicitly defined, but could be confusing. rst-lint will error on duplicate definitions, but if someone forgets the 2nd definition, it would silently reference the first. Maybe reference PRs as (PR#469_) and keep (#469_) for issues?
• minor point, but all the trailing whitespace makes editing the changelog difficult as my editor strips it. Would someone be happy stripping it? Or maybe my editor settings are overzealous :-)

[The-Compiler]

we're in risk of the (#469_) numbers referencing both issues and pull requests clashing (both are up to around 1400 now). Obviously all links are explicitly defined, but could be confusing. rst-lint will error on duplicate definitions, but if someone forgets the 2nd definition, it would silently reference the first.

I don't understand how they'd clash - both PRs and issues draw from the same "number pool", so there never will be a PR with the same number as an issue.

[tomviner]

both PRs and issues draw from the same "number pool"

@The-Compiler ahhh, that's a most satisfying explanation for why the numbers are so close! Ignore my point then 😁

[hpk42]

what about putting the links inline so one can easily click on it when reading the text version of the changelog? (yes, i often do that)

[nicoddemus]

Thanks @tomviner! 😁

@hpk42 no problem... that might even help avoiding merge conflicts, as each entry will be self contained. Will change that on the next opportunity and see how that goes.