Skip to content

Improve the coverage of testing/code #3887

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2018
Merged

Improve the coverage of testing/code #3887

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2018

Conversation

asottile
Copy link
Member

One of many branches -- I used the codecov output from #3875 to find these.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 92.641% when pulling 1e8e17c on asottile:improve_test_code into a319674 on pytest-dev:master.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3887 into master will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3887      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.59%   92.64%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        9960     9960              
==========================================
+ Hits         9222     9227       +5     
+ Misses        738      733       -5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/_pytest/terminal.py 94.42% <0%> (+0.92%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a319674...1e8e17c. Read the comment docs.

@nicoddemus nicoddemus merged commit 9620b16 into pytest-dev:master Aug 27, 2018
@asottile asottile deleted the improve_test_code branch September 20, 2018 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants