Skip to content

Correct license (MIT/X => MIT). #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2013

Conversation

rsternagel
Copy link
Contributor

The license (file) you are using seems to be MIT and not MIT/X (as Wikipedia states - referring to the distinguishing sentence). After some research I am confused, because now I see that you may intend this (similar to GNU/Linux).

This may be one of the tiniest and most useless pull requests ever, but you got me curious. ;)

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Feb 17, 2013

Heh. It's useful and welcomed. This stuff is terribly overcomplicated so I appreciate the eye for detail. Merging,

Julian added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2013
Correct license (MIT/X => MIT).
@Julian Julian merged commit 955b4ed into python-jsonschema:master Feb 17, 2013
Julian added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2014
9208016 Merge pull request #67 from iainbeeston/defaults
f57888c Added tests around the default property
db28fee Merge pull request #63 from iainbeeston/patch-1
609944b Added the json-schema ruby gem to the list of libraries using the test suite

git-subtree-dir: json
git-subtree-split: 9208016d04c1b6774d5a17e8b037161873414edb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something doesn't work the way it should.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants