Skip to content

Markup missing in docs for inspect.Signature.replace() #108857

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
brettcannon opened this issue Sep 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Markup missing in docs for inspect.Signature.replace() #108857

brettcannon opened this issue Sep 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir easy

Comments

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

brettcannon commented Sep 4, 2023

Documentation

The word "replace" in the docs for inspect.Signature.replace() is missing appropriate markup to make it not appear as just the word "replace":

Create a new Signature instance based on the instance replace was invoked

Probably needs a :meth:, but at least some code literal markup.

Linked PRs

@nabin2004
Copy link
Contributor

@brettcannon, I think I've wrapped up the task. This is my first time contributing to open source, so I apologize if I made any mistakes.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
brettcannon pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
…H-108862) (#108970)

gh-108857: improve markup in inspect.Signature.replace() docs (GH-108862)
(cherry picked from commit 6f8411c)

Co-authored-by: nabin2004 <[email protected]>
brettcannon pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
…H-108862) (#108971)

gh-108857: improve markup in inspect.Signature.replace() docs (GH-108862)
(cherry picked from commit 6f8411c)

Co-authored-by: nabin2004 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir easy
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants