Skip to content

gh-87864: Use correct function definition syntax in the docs #103312

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2023

Conversation

sobolevn
Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Apr 6, 2023

I've changed ... in the parameter list of function definitions to be argN or similar.
It looks to me as it is a better thing to do: while we keep the same (or even clearer semantics), we also use the correct python syntax to do it.

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

@hugovk can you please take a look when you have the time?

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @sobolevn for the PR, and @hugovk for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-103442 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Apr 11, 2023
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants