-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32k
gh-121485: Always use 64-bit integers for integers bits count #121486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Use 64-bit integers instead of platform specific size_t or Py_ssize_t to represent the number of bits in Python integer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely +1 for the idea. I'm afraid I won't have bandwidth for a detailed code review in the near future.
And what do you think about imposing a hard limit on Python integers, so integers larger than |
I can update this PR for the later idea or implement it in a separate issue. |
That sounds totally reasonable to me (presumably as a CPython detail, rather than an aspect of Python-the-language). Any future computing landscape that makes operating on ints of that size remotely feasible is going to look very different from today's landscape. |
Thanks, @gpshead. |
Use 64-bit integers instead of platform specific size_t or Py_ssize_t to represent the number of bits in Python integer.