Skip to content

[3.11] gh-96357: Improve typing.get_overloads coverage (GH-96358) #96371

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 29, 2022

(cherry picked from commit 675e347)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev [email protected]

(cherry picked from commit 675e347)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sobolevn and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

@sobolevn sobolevn closed this Aug 29, 2022
@sobolevn sobolevn reopened this Aug 29, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sobolevn and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sobolevn and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

Will merge after 3.11.0 final.

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member

sobolevn commented Sep 5, 2022

Offtopic. I am always confused: why status check "is a success", but icon is a red "no-no" sign?
Снимок экрана 2022-09-06 в 0 39 19

Should it be this way?

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

Yes, that feels like a bug. I think there's been some discussion of it in the core dev discord but I don't recall the cause.

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit f418842 into python:3.11 Sep 29, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-675e347-3.11 branch September 29, 2022 01:06
@sobolevn
Copy link
Member

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants