Skip to content

Make parallel mapper work on dataset specific transformations #1486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

divyanshk
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 13, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73187135

divyanshk added a commit to divyanshk/data that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…h#1486)

Summary:

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73187135

divyanshk added a commit to divyanshk/data that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…h#1486)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1486

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 13, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/data/1486

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit a711a9a with merge base ac259e1 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

divyanshk added a commit to divyanshk/data that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…h#1486)

Summary:

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
@divyanshk divyanshk force-pushed the export-D73187135 branch 2 times, most recently from aac03d6 to 26b1af9 Compare May 13, 2025 18:12
divyanshk added a commit to divyanshk/data that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…h#1486)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1486

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73187135

divyanshk added a commit to divyanshk/data that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…h#1486)

Summary:

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
…h#1486)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1486

Adding a new option to make multi node sampler emit dicts with dataset keys

Reviewed By: ramanishsingh

Differential Revision: D73187135
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73187135

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit 8d97fbb into pytorch:main May 13, 2025
33 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants