use dim order in arm test

[Gasoonjia]

Summary: as title

Differential Revision: D68177095

cc @digantdesai @freddan80 @per @zingo @oscarandersson8218

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7697

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 77cc1c4 with merge base 0dba025 ():
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[facebook-github-bot]

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D68177095

[Gasoonjia]

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

[digantdesai]

I am ok with this, I will let @oscarandersson8218 stamp this given there is some history behind dim_order support in arm delegate.

[oscarandersson8218]

@digantdesai @Gasoonjia Looks good to me. In order to actually test this we need to flip the switch in the Tester base class as well. When I did, I found failures for our to_copy tests. I have a fix for it internally which should be upstreamed soon. Can you park this PR until then?

@digantdesai: @oscarandersson8218, since you are already fixing this, alternatively you can commandeer this PR (or create a new one) and take care of arm delegate dim order enablement?

@oscarandersson8218: @digantdesai Yes, I can add the changes of this PR to my change.

[oscarandersson8218]

@digantdesai @Gasoonjia Moved this to #7831 along with other fixes.

[zingo]

Hi @Gasoonjia the #7831 PR has been merged, is it OK to close this PR?

[Gasoonjia]

@zingo
Thanks for working on dim order! Closing it.

[zingo]

The same, the thanks on our side should go to @oscarandersson8218 I just pressed submit 😂