-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix BooleanHamiltonian.with_qubits() to work with not only NamedQubits #4396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
balopat
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - can you add a descriptive description for the PR? That becomes the commit message, we should be pedantic about it. Also add "Fixes #4390." as the last line. Thanks!
@balopat |
rht
pushed a commit
to rht/Cirq
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2023
quantumlib#4396) The current code at head does not implement BooleanHamiltonian.with_qubits() correctly. It assumes that the qubits are named and then maps them to the variable name. This is restrictive, does not follow the other classes' with_qubits(). It is also incorrect because it silently accepts a list of qubits with missing entries (e.g. there is a variable name 'a' but we don't provide a qubit named 'a'), and the error is thrown only when decompose_once() is called. Instead, here the code accepts a list of qubits and replaces them in the map. It requires that there are as many qubits provided as there were when building the object. Also, it relies on the order of the qubit keys when building the BooleanHamiltonian object, but that is currently a restriction of the API. Fixes quantumlib#4390.
harry-phasecraft
pushed a commit
to PhaseCraft/Cirq
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
quantumlib#4396) The current code at head does not implement BooleanHamiltonian.with_qubits() correctly. It assumes that the qubits are named and then maps them to the variable name. This is restrictive, does not follow the other classes' with_qubits(). It is also incorrect because it silently accepts a list of qubits with missing entries (e.g. there is a variable name 'a' but we don't provide a qubit named 'a'), and the error is thrown only when decompose_once() is called. Instead, here the code accepts a list of qubits and replaces them in the map. It requires that there are as many qubits provided as there were when building the object. Also, it relies on the order of the qubit keys when building the BooleanHamiltonian object, but that is currently a restriction of the API. Fixes quantumlib#4390.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current code at head does not implement BooleanHamiltonian.with_qubits() correctly. It assumes that the qubits are named and then maps them to the variable name.
This is restrictive, does not follow the other classes' with_qubits(). It is also incorrect because it silently accepts a list of qubits with missing entries (e.g. there is a variable name 'a' but we don't provide a qubit named 'a'), and the error is thrown only when decompose_once() is called.
Instead, here the code accepts a list of qubits and replaces them in the map. It requires that there are as many qubits provided as there were when building the object. Also, it relies on the order of the qubit keys when building the BooleanHamiltonian object, but that is currently a restriction of the API.
Fixes #4390.