Skip to content

Deprecate least_squares functions in fidelity_estimation #5428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dstrain115
Copy link
Collaborator

  • These functions are inefficient and have been obsoleted
    by vectorized versions in xeb_fitting.

This is part of the plan to deprecate redundant XEB functionality as
part of #3775.

- These functions are inefficient and have been obsoleted
by vectorized versions in xeb_fitting.

This is part of the plan to deprecate redundant XEB functionality as
part of quantumlib#3775.
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested review from mrwojtek, a team, vtomole and cduck as code owners June 1, 2022 17:40
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested review from viathor and mpharrigan June 1, 2022 17:40
@dstrain115 dstrain115 added the automerge Tells CirqBot to sync and merge this PR. (If it's running.) label Jun 1, 2022
@dstrain115 dstrain115 merged commit 209c76e into quantumlib:master Jun 1, 2022
rht pushed a commit to rht/Cirq that referenced this pull request May 1, 2023
…5428)

- These functions are inefficient and have been obsoleted
by vectorized versions in xeb_fitting.

This is part of the plan to deprecate redundant XEB functionality as
part of quantumlib#3775.
harry-phasecraft pushed a commit to PhaseCraft/Cirq that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
…5428)

- These functions are inefficient and have been obsoleted
by vectorized versions in xeb_fitting.

This is part of the plan to deprecate redundant XEB functionality as
part of quantumlib#3775.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Tells CirqBot to sync and merge this PR. (If it's running.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants