Skip to content

Update docs to use [email protected] #6804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

mhucka
Copy link
Contributor

@mhucka mhucka commented Nov 19, 2024

The Code of Conduct still referred people to Bálint, so that needed to be changed. Also, it seems like a good idea to mention the maintainers' address in the top-level README file.

The Code of Conduct still referred people to Bálint, so that needed to
be changed. Also, it seems like a good idea to mention the
maintainers' address in the top-level README file.
@CirqBot CirqBot added the size: S 10< lines changed <50 label Nov 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.85%. Comparing base (f2c7330) to head (e42052b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6804   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.85%   97.85%           
=======================================
  Files        1084     1084           
  Lines       93674    93680    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        91665    91671    +6     
  Misses       2009     2009           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@mhucka mhucka marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2024 19:35
@mhucka mhucka requested review from vtomole and a team as code owners November 19, 2024 19:35
@mhucka mhucka requested a review from dstrain115 November 19, 2024 19:35
consisting of representatives from the Open Source Programs Office and the
Google Open Source Strategy team. If for any reason you are uncomfortable
reaching out to the Project Steward, please email [email protected].
Reports should be directed to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit - GitHub seems to detect and activate email links in markdown and rst without special syntax. Please adjust here and below. Temporary example: https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/blob/40832d819322777e851e8a1d7cd22ccd2d3832c8/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md#conflict-resolution

Also, let us keep the 80-character line wrap for the sake of those who read text files as text. :-)

Suggested change
Reports should be directed to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]),
Reports should be directed to [email protected],

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess I never noticed that before. Thanks for the tip!

Regarding 80 chars: in fact, I try to do that always, but in this case, the README.rst file already had those long lines, and I didn't want to format it in order to keep this PR only about the address changes. I'm working on converting the files to Markdown and am about to do a PR for that, and there, the results will be ≤ 80 chars.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pavoljuhas I could, however, reformat the README.rst file to keep to 80 chars, if that's preferred?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mhucka - apologies about the confusion - I meant the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md which is within the 80 char limit in the main, so it would be nice to keep such format after the PR.

No need to worry about README.rst if it already has long lines. I agree this can be left for later, especially if you already plan on converting to markdown. (we also don't want to have a lot of extra diffs beyond the subject of the PR)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, at first I thought I couldn't break the mailto hyperlinks across lines in the CoC file, but I just checked, and yes it is. So you're right, I should have done that.

That's no longer needed with the change to avoid hyperlinking, but I'll know to do that in the future.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pavoljuhas pavoljuhas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for checking and fixing this!

LGTM, with a nitpicky inline comment.

Turns out GH automatically links email addresses.
@mhucka mhucka merged commit 2991e80 into quantumlib:main Nov 19, 2024
37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: S 10< lines changed <50
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants