Skip to content

Include k8s 1.20 in PR system tests #521

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2020
Merged

Include k8s 1.20 in PR system tests #521

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2020

Conversation

ChunyiLyu
Copy link
Contributor

Note to reviewers: remember to look at the commits in this PR and consider if they can be squashed

Summary Of Changes

  • Add k8s 1.20 in PR system tests
  • Bump to k8s 1.19.1 to the latest 1.19.4

Additional Context

Not removing 1.17 from system tests matrixes just yet since many people are still using older version of k8s and it's not adding any feedback times to our PR workflow since it's parallel anyways

Copy link
Contributor

@coro coro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good to me, just one question

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ jobs:
export GOPATH=$HOME/go
export PATH=$PATH:$GOPATH/bin
make install-tools
kind create cluster --image kindest/node:v1.19.1
kind create cluster --image kindest/node:v1.19.4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.20 is GA, right? So I feel we should probably be testing on 1.20 by default wherever we have a default (like here)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point and updated!

- and bump k8s version 1.19.1 to 1.19.4
in system tests
@ChunyiLyu ChunyiLyu merged commit ce22254 into main Dec 10, 2020
@ChunyiLyu ChunyiLyu deleted the pr-1.19 branch December 10, 2020 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants