Enforce ordering of pico_add_extra_outputs and picotool functions #2054
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
peterharperuk
previously approved these changes
Nov 19, 2024
lurch
reviewed
Nov 19, 2024
lurch
reviewed
Nov 19, 2024
…URED` and `picotool_check_configurable`
lurch
reviewed
Nov 19, 2024
kilograham
previously approved these changes
Nov 19, 2024
kilograham
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This throws a fatal error if a picotool post-processing function (eg
pico_sign_binary) comes afterpico_add_extra_outputshas been called for that target. Without this any picotool post-processing functions afterpico_add_extra_outputswill have no effect.