-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
One of the test suite deps has a regression #892
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I'd like to take a stab at this! I'm looking to make my first open source contribution and will take a few hours to look at it this week. |
@suhailnaw Thank you, it's certainly possible to simply peg the version of all the gems down for that appraisal to solve it, but I'd like to know which specific gem had a backward-incompatible change. (So we can go blame them 😉 ) Good luck and most importantly have fun. |
Hey @BookOfGreg I'm still working on this issue. I wanted to update you on my work so far. I compared the versions of the Ruby gems from the broken builds and the working builds and did not find a difference. I then thought it might be the version of Chrome that was the issue, but changing it in the PR above did not work. My next step is to set up the local dev environment on my computer. I'm going to use rbenv to manage the two versions of Ruby we're interested in, 2.3.0 and 2.5.0, and try to get the builds to work. Do you have any ideas of where to look? I would also like to use TravisCI to troubleshoot since I'm finding the graphical interface of build history useful. But I don't want to crowd your commit history. Is the standard procedure just to develop locally or can I use TravisCI? |
I suspected the gems because it's not easy to get a gemfile lock when using appraisal Additionally I was able to run the tests on my local machine but when I removed my appraisal lockfiles it failed in the same way. |
👀 |
The cause of the error seems to be an incompatibility of webpacker. ref. #916 |
Well done getting to the bottom of this one, it's been bothering me for ages. Do you think Webpack was also mangling the names of internal classes given the removal of I wonder if I declare it as a global then I could re-instate that test. Otherwise nice work 👍 |
I'm not 100% sure, but yes, I think the way of minifying/uglifying pack files isn't an external specification but an implementation detail of Webpack(er). I think |
Steps to reproduce
Look at the Travis
Expected behaviour
Green 🎉
Actual behaviour
Red 😢
Last successful one was https://travis-ci.org/reactjs/react-rails/jobs/342097144
Check the bundle section and play a game of whack-a-gem. Can replicate locally if I
bundle exec appraisal update
thenbundle exec appraisal rake
.This was not caught as my appraisal install was stale.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: