Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(feature) try-reclaim issue#21 #34

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

inline-arc
Copy link

@inline-arc inline-arc commented Mar 9, 2025

Description

  1. Implement a live demo: Improve the try-reclaim.mdx with more interactive elements #21
  • Create a simple, embedded application that demonstrates Reclaim Protocol in action
  • Allow users to generate and verify a proof within the documentation page

Testing (ignore for documentation update)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

Additional Notes:

The demo website repository will be transferred to the maintainer, @adithyaakrishna, in as with the contribution guidelines. The live preview is expected to receive further updates for refinement. For any documentation updates, please assign them to me request, and feel free to highlight any corrections or improvements needed.

Reclaim-Live-Demo
https://reclaim-live-demo.vercel.app/

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced an interactive demo titled "Reclaim Live" that offers a guided walkthrough for generating and verifying proofs.
  • Documentation
    • Expanded the documentation set with a new entry for "Try Reclaim", enhancing the navigational structure and providing users with additional resources.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 9, 2025 2:59pm

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 9, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the documentation configuration by adding a new page entry ("try-reclaim") to the pages array in the main meta.json file. Additionally, a new documentation section is introduced under the "try-reclaim" directory, which includes a meta.json file setting the title and a new MDX file ("try-reclaim.mdx") containing an interactive demo called "Reclaim Live." The demo outlines the verification process steps with an embedded iframe and guide.

Changes

File(s) Summary
content/docs/meta.json Updated the "pages" array to include the "try-reclaim" page.
content/docs/try-reclaim/meta.json
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx
Added new documentation files for the "try-reclaim" section: a meta file setting its title and an MDX file that introduces the "Reclaim Live" interactive demo with an iframe and step-by-step guide.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DocPage as "Try-Reclaim Page"
    participant Demo as "Reclaim Live Demo"
    participant QR as "QR Module"
    
    User->>DocPage: Navigate to Try-Reclaim Page
    User->>Demo: Select provider & start verification
    Demo->>QR: Request QR code generation
    QR-->>Demo: Return QR code
    Demo->>User: Display QR code for scanning
    User->>Demo: Scan QR code and submit proof
    Demo-->>User: Verify credentials
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a nimble hop,
Adding pages that never stop.
New docs spring with interactive gleam,
A live demo that's a coder's dream.
I nibble bugs and celebrate the change,
Hopping forward in a digital range! 🐰✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx (2)

7-7: Correct singular/plural grammar in content text.
The phrase "Explore more provider" should use the plural form.
Suggested diff:

-Explore more provider on [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://dev.reclaimprotocol.org/)
+Explore more providers on the [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://dev.reclaimprotocol.org/)
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...n this documentation page. Explore more provider on [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://d...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)


24-24: Fix typographical error in link text.
There's a typo where "webstie" should be "website".
Suggested diff:

-View the full webstie on [Reclaim Live](https://reclaim-live-demo.vercel.app/)
+View the full website on [Reclaim Live](https://reclaim-live-demo.vercel.app/)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f125509 and 0d8cf5f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • content/docs/meta.json (1 hunks)
  • content/docs/try-reclaim/meta.json (1 hunks)
  • content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...n this documentation page. Explore more provider on [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://d...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
content/docs/try-reclaim/meta.json (1)

1-3: Good metadata configuration.
The JSON file correctly sets the title for the "Try Reclaim" page in a clean and valid format.

content/docs/meta.json (1)

1-4: Pages configuration updated correctly.
The "try-reclaim" entry has been successfully added to the "pages" array, expanding the documentation as expected.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx (3)

7-7: Grammar Correction Required
The sentence "Explore more provider on ..." should use the plural "providers" to correctly match the context.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...n this documentation page. Explore more provider on [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://d...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)


15-22: Interactive Demo Embedding
The iframe is correctly embedded with appropriate attributes to ensure responsiveness and a visually appealing design. As a potential enhancement, consider providing fallback content (e.g., a text message or link) for browsers that do not support iframes or in case the demo fails to load.


24-24: Typographical Error
There's a small typo in the call-to-action text: "webstie" should be corrected to "website" for clarity.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d8cf5f and f089143.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...n this documentation page. Explore more provider on [Reclaim Developer Portal](https://d...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
content/docs/try-reclaim/try-reclaim.mdx (1)

1-4: Front Matter Validation
The front matter block is well-structured with a clear title and an accurate description that matches the demo's intent. No modifications needed here.

@adithyaakrishna
Copy link
Contributor

@inline-arc Pls do give us sometime to review and discuss abt this internally and I'll personally get back to you on this :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants