Skip to content

Fixed Keycloak SSO image, and upgraded Redis images #609

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

anandf
Copy link
Member

@anandf anandf commented Oct 2, 2023

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

Nightly test pipelines were failing with Non OLM installation. These were the test failures. Caused due to wrong Keycloak SSO default image. Also upgraded the Redis and Redis HA default images.

        --- FAIL: kuttl/harness/1-050_validate_sso (788.64s)
        --- FAIL: kuttl/harness/1-028_validate_run_on_infra (738.22s)
        --- FAIL: kuttl/harness/1-008_validate-4.9CI-Failures (723.18s)
        --- FAIL: kuttl/harness/1-020_validate_redis_ha_nonha (723.07s)
        --- FAIL: kuttl/harness/1-002_validate_backend_service (723.29s)

What does this PR do / why we need it:

Have you updated the necessary documentation?

  • Documentation update is required by this PR.
  • Documentation has been updated.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #?

Test acceptance criteria:

  • Unit Test
  • E2E Test

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Oct 2, 2023
@ishitasequeira
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@ishitasequeira
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@anandf anandf force-pushed the fix_non_olm_keycloak_image branch from baf37f1 to 25a156a Compare October 10, 2023 04:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Oct 10, 2023
@anandf
Copy link
Member Author

anandf commented Oct 10, 2023

/retest-required

@anandf
Copy link
Member Author

anandf commented Oct 10, 2023

/test v4.12-kuttl-sequential

@ishitasequeira
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 10, 2023
@saumeya
Copy link
Member

saumeya commented Oct 11, 2023

/approve

1 similar comment
@anandf
Copy link
Member Author

anandf commented Oct 11, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anandf, ishitasequeira, saumeya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 8aa2f88 into redhat-developer:master Oct 11, 2023
trdoyle81 pushed a commit to trdoyle81/gitops-operator that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved kind/bug Something isn't working lgtm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants