-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Namespace non existent should be handled #2180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@dgolovin We need to test if this scenario exists for the current workflow. |
I am looking to help out with OpenShift Toolkit. Do you think this would be a good issue to start with? |
I can recreate this issue by setting the context to a non existing namespace using When using a non-existant namespace, all the UI elements are greyed out, so I can't change namespaces using OpenShift Toolkit. |
Ugh now I can't do anything at all with the extension :( |
When the currently configured namespace doesn't exist, switch to the first available namespace. Closes redhat-developer#2180 Signed-off-by: David Thompson <[email protected]>
When the currently configured namespace doesn't exist, switch to the first available namespace. Closes #2180 Signed-off-by: David Thompson <[email protected]>
If the current context is using a non existent namespace on the cluster, the Application Explorer is empty. We should handle this case:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: