Skip to content

Removing the requirements.txt from docs building dependencies #3527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

petyaslavova
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request check-list

Please make sure to review and check all of these items:

  • Do tests and lints pass with this change?
  • Do the CI tests pass with this change (enable it first in your forked repo and wait for the github action build to finish)?
  • Is the new or changed code fully tested?
  • Is a documentation update included (if this change modifies existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
  • Is there an example added to the examples folder (if applicable)?
  • Was the change added to CHANGES file?

NOTE: these things are not required to open a PR and can be done
afterwards / while the PR is open.

Description of change

Removing the requirements.txt from docs building dependencies
Removing forgotten mention of the file from README doc

Tested locally that the docs build is successful without installing the dependencies that were part of requirements.txt

@petyaslavova petyaslavova added the maintenance Maintenance (CI, Releases, etc) label Feb 25, 2025
@petyaslavova petyaslavova force-pushed the ps_fix_failing_docs_build branch from a7066d9 to 64e0d68 Compare February 25, 2025 12:02
@petyaslavova petyaslavova merged commit 4418907 into master Feb 25, 2025
37 checks passed
@petyaslavova petyaslavova deleted the ps_fix_failing_docs_build branch February 25, 2025 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Maintenance (CI, Releases, etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants