reorganize e2e tests (split Python and TS) #329
Conversation
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request involve substantial restructuring of end-to-end test cases across multiple files, focusing on both TypeScript and Python environments. Key modifications include the removal of unnecessary variables, the introduction of new functions for better maintainability, and the addition of a dedicated job for Python testing in the GitHub Actions workflow. These updates streamline the testing logic and expand the testing capabilities to include various configurations. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
e2e/resolve_ts_dependencies.spec.ts (2)
45-48: Good addition of a focused LlamaParse test!This separate test case for LlamaParse with vectorDB 'none' is a good approach. It allows for testing LlamaParse functionality without slowing down the main vector DB tests, which aligns with the PR objective.
Consider updating the test description to be more consistent with the previous test:
- test(`LlamaParse test - vectorDb: none, dataSource: ${dataSource}, llamaParse: true`, async () => { + test(`LlamaParse test - vectorDb: none, dataSource: ${dataSource}`, async () => {This change removes the redundant
llamaParse: truefrom the description, as it's already implied by "LlamaParse test".
74-108: Thorough implementation of dependency installation and type checking!The second part of the
runTestfunction is comprehensive, covering all necessary steps to verify the correct setup and TypeScript compatibility. The use ofpnpmfor dependency installation is a good choice and may contribute to faster test execution.For consistency with the error handling in the TypeScript checking step, consider adding a similar console.log for successful type-checking:
// Check if there's any error output expect(stderr).toBeFalsy(); // Log the stdout for debugging purposes console.log("TypeScript type-check output:", stdout); + console.log("TypeScript type-check completed successfully"); } catch (error) { console.error("Error running tsc:", error); throw error; }This addition would provide a clear indication of successful type-checking, matching the error logging style used elsewhere in the function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- e2e/resolve_ts_dependencies.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
e2e/resolve_ts_dependencies.spec.ts (4)
36-43: Excellent optimization of test cases!This change simplifies the test structure by removing the nested loop for
llamaParseOptions. By focusing on testing vector databases without LlamaParse, you've reduced the number of test iterations, which aligns well with the PR objective of speeding up the test.
50-53: Great introduction of therunTestfunction!The
runTestfunction is a excellent addition that encapsulates the test logic. This approach reduces code duplication and improves maintainability, which can indirectly contribute to faster test execution and easier future modifications.
54-71: Well-implemented test setup inrunTest!The first part of the
runTestfunction is well-structured and correctly utilizes the provided parameters. It efficiently sets up the test environment by creating a test directory and running the Llama creation process with the appropriate configurations.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall excellent changes that align with the PR objective!The modifications in this file significantly contribute to speeding up the test process, which was the main objective of this PR. Key improvements include:
- Simplifying the test structure by removing nested loops.
- Introducing a
runTestfunction to encapsulate and reuse test logic.- Separating LlamaParse testing from vector DB testing for more focused and efficient execution.
- Using
pnpmfor potentially faster dependency installation.These changes not only speed up the test execution but also improve code maintainability and readability. Great job on achieving the PR objective while maintaining code quality!
marcusschiesser
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
e2e/shared/extractor_template.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-68: Suggestion: Measure impact and consider additional test coverageWhile the changes speed up this specific test file, it's important to:
- Measure the actual impact on the overall test suite execution time.
- Ensure that other frameworks and data sources are still being tested, possibly in separate files.
Consider the following actions:
- Add timing logs at the beginning and end of the test suite to quantify the speed improvement.
- If not already present, create separate test files for other frameworks and data sources to maintain comprehensive coverage.
Here's a script to help identify if there are already separate test files for other frameworks:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other test files covering different frameworks and data sources echo "Searching for other test files:" fd -e ts -e js 'spec|test' e2e echo "Checking content of found test files for framework and data source coverage:" fd -e ts -e js 'spec|test' e2e -x rg -i 'templateFramework|dataSource'Review the output to ensure adequate test coverage across different scenarios.
.github/workflows/e2e.yml (3)
12-13: Consider renaming the job for clarityThe current job name "create-llama-python" might not accurately reflect its purpose as an E2E test for Python. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive like "e2e-python-tests" for consistency with the TypeScript job and better clarity.
e2e-python: - name: create-llama-python + name: e2e-python-tests
79-80: Consider renaming the job for claritySimilar to the Python job, the current job name "create-llama-typescript" might not accurately reflect its purpose as an E2E test for TypeScript. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive like "e2e-typescript-tests" for better clarity and consistency.
e2e-typescript: - name: create-llama-typescript + name: e2e-typescript-tests
Line range hint
1-144: Overall improvements and optimization suggestionsThe separation of Python and TypeScript E2E tests into distinct jobs is a positive change that enhances clarity and maintainability. However, there are some potential optimizations to consider:
Common Setup: Consider extracting common setup steps (like Node.js and pnpm installation) into a reusable GitHub Actions composite action. This would reduce duplication and make maintenance easier.
Caching: Implement caching for dependencies (both Python and Node.js) to speed up workflow runs. This can significantly reduce the time spent on installing dependencies in each run.
Parallel Execution: Ensure that the two jobs (
e2e-pythonande2e-typescript) are set to run in parallel to minimize total execution time.Timeout Review: Re-evaluate the 60-minute timeout for both jobs. If tests consistently complete faster, consider reducing this value.
Conditional Execution: If possible, implement conditional execution of these E2E tests based on the files changed in the PR. This can help reduce unnecessary test runs and save CI resources.
Here's an example of how you might implement caching for both Python and Node.js dependencies:
- uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: ~/.cache/pip key: ${{ runner.os }}-pip-${{ hashFiles('**/requirements.txt') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-pip- - uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: ~/.pnpm-store key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-Add these steps before the dependency installation steps in both jobs to potentially speed up the workflow.
e2e/python/resolve_dependencies.spec.ts (3)
6-6: Remove unused importTemplateFrameworkThe
TemplateFrameworktype is no longer used in this file after the removal of thetemplateFrameworkvariable. To keep the imports clean and avoid confusion, please remove this unused import.Apply this change:
-import { TemplateVectorDB, TemplateFramework } from "../../helpers/types"; +import { TemplateVectorDB } from "../../helpers/types";
Line range hint
18-20: Approve simplification of test condition and suggest comment updateThe removal of the
templateFrameworkcondition simplifies the test logic, which is good. However, the comment above the condition could be updated to reflect this change more accurately.Consider updating the comment to:
- dataSource === "--example-file" // XXX: this test provides its own data source - only trigger it on one data source (usually the CI matrix will trigger multiple data sources) + dataSource === "--example-file" // Only run this test for the example file data source to avoid redundant executions in CIThis change clarifies the purpose of the condition without referencing multiple data sources that are no longer part of the condition.
Inconsistent Usage of
templateFrameworkinrunCreateLlamaCallsThe
runCreateLlamafunction is invoked in multiple test files with varying approaches to thetemplateFrameworkparameter:
Hard-coded Value:
templateFramework: "fastapi"Variable Reference:
templateFrameworkThis inconsistency may lead to reduced test coverage or inaccurate test results. It is recommended to standardize the handling of the
templateFrameworkparameter across all test cases.Actions to Consider:
- Remove the
templateFrameworkparameter if it's no longer necessary.- Parameterize
templateFrameworkto allow testing with different frameworks consistently.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
55-69: ReviewrunCreateLlamafunction call for consistencyThe
templateFrameworkparameter in therunCreateLlamafunction call is still set to "fastapi", despite the removal of thetemplateFrameworkvariable and related condition. This inconsistency might lead to reduced test coverage or inaccurate results.Please review this function call and consider one of the following actions:
- Remove the
templateFrameworkparameter if it's no longer needed.- Parameterize the
templateFrameworkvalue if different frameworks still need to be tested.To verify the usage of
runCreateLlamaand its parameters, run the following script:Based on the results, update the function call accordingly to ensure consistent testing across all required frameworks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of runCreateLlama function and its parameters # Test: Search for runCreateLlama function calls echo "Searching for runCreateLlama function calls:" rg --type typescript 'runCreateLlama\(' -A 10 -B 2Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of runCreateLlama function and its parameters in TypeScript files # Find all .ts and .tsx files and search for runCreateLlama function calls echo "Searching for runCreateLlama function calls in TypeScript files:" fd --extension ts --extension tsx --type file | xargs rg 'runCreateLlama\(' -A 10 -B 2Length of output: 5168
e2e/typescript/resolve_dependencies.spec.ts (3)
85-87: Avoid redundant console error loggingSince the error is rethrown, the testing framework will handle the reporting. Logging the error again using
console.errorcan lead to duplicate error messages in the test output.Consider removing the
console.errorstatement:} catch (error) { - console.error("Error installing dependencies:", error); throw error; }
101-101: Limit console output to reduce clutter in test resultsPrinting the TypeScript type-check output for every test can produce excessive logs, making it harder to identify actual issues. Unless this output is needed for debugging, it's better to suppress it or enable it conditionally.
Consider removing the
console.logstatement or wrapping it with a debug flag:- console.log("TypeScript type-check output:", stdout);
103-105: Avoid redundant console error loggingAs the error is rethrown, the testing framework will report it. Logging it again using
console.errormay result in duplicated messages.Consider removing the
console.errorstatement:} catch (error) { - console.error("Error running tsc:", error); throw error; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- .github/workflows/e2e.yml (3 hunks)
- e2e/python/resolve_dependencies.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- e2e/resolve_ts_dependencies.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- e2e/shared/extractor_template.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- e2e/shared/multiagent_template.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- e2e/shared/streaming_template.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- e2e/typescript/resolve_dependencies.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- e2e/resolve_ts_dependencies.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (11)
e2e/shared/extractor_template.spec.ts (1)
6-7: LGTM: Import paths updated correctlyThe changes to the import statements reflect a reorganization of the project structure. This is a good practice for maintaining a clean and organized codebase.
package.json (1)
28-29: Approve the addition of language-specific e2e test scripts.The new e2e test scripts for Python and TypeScript are a good addition that aligns with the PR objective of speeding up tests. By allowing developers to run language-specific tests, it can potentially reduce the time needed for testing during development and CI processes.
Some suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding a comment in the
package.jsonfile explaining the purpose of these new scripts and when to use them.- Update the project's documentation to reflect these new testing options.
- If not already implemented, consider updating your CI pipeline to leverage these new scripts for faster builds.
To improve documentation, you could add comments to the scripts like this:
{ "scripts": { "e2e": "playwright test", + // Run end-to-end tests for Python-related components "e2e:python": "playwright test e2e/shared e2e/python", + // Run end-to-end tests for TypeScript-related components "e2e:typescript": "playwright test e2e/shared e2e/typescript", } }To ensure these new scripts are properly integrated and don't conflict with existing setups, let's verify the e2e test structure:
✅ Verification successful
Playwright configuration confirmed and e2e scripts are correctly set up.
The Playwright configuration file
playwright.config.tsis present at the repository root, and the e2e test directories (python,shared,typescript) contain the necessary test files. The new language-specific e2e scripts are properly integrated and should effectively contribute to speeding up the testing process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the e2e test directory structure and contents # Check if the e2e directories exist echo "Checking e2e directory structure:" fd -t d . e2e # List the contents of the e2e directories echo "\nListing contents of e2e directories:" fd . e2e # Check for any existing playwright configuration echo "\nChecking for playwright configuration:" fd playwright.config e2eLength of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for Playwright configuration files in the entire repository echo "Searching for Playwright configuration files:" fd playwright.config .Length of output: 148
e2e/shared/streaming_template.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-124: Comprehensive test suite with no issues from import changes.The changes to the import statements don't seem to have affected the rest of the file. The test suite remains comprehensive, covering various aspects of the application including:
- Folder creation
- Frontend title visibility
- Message submission and response
- Backend API response (for non-Next.js frameworks)
This thorough testing approach is commendable and helps ensure the reliability of the application across different configurations.
10-11: Verify import path changes and update related files if necessary.The changes to the import paths look correct and align with the project restructuring. However, to ensure the stability of the project, please consider the following:
- Verify that the new import paths ("../../helpers" and "../utils") are correct and the imported modules are accessible from this file's new location.
- Check if there are any other files in the project that import from similar paths and update them accordingly to maintain consistency.
To help verify the correctness of the import paths and identify other files that might need updates, you can run the following script:
.github/workflows/e2e.yml (4)
81-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReview the necessity of Python setup for TypeScript tests
The TypeScript E2E job still includes Python setup steps. If these tests are specifically for TypeScript and don't require any Python components, consider removing the Python-related setup to streamline the job.
If Python is not needed for TypeScript tests, you can remove the following sections:
- python-version: ["3.11"] os: [macos-latest, windows-latest, ubuntu-22.04] frameworks: ["nextjs", "express"] datasources: ["--no-files", "--example-file"] defaults: run: shell: bash runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }} steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - - name: Set up python ${{ matrix.python-version }} - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 - with: - python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }} - - - name: Install Poetry - uses: snok/install-poetry@v1 - with: - version: ${{ env.POETRY_VERSION }}To confirm if Python is needed in the TypeScript tests, you can run this script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python usage in TypeScript tests # Search for Python-related imports or executions in TypeScript test files echo "Checking for Python usage in TypeScript tests:" rg -t ts "python|from.*import|import.*from.*py" ./testsThis script will search for any Python-related code in your TypeScript test files. If no results are found, it's likely safe to remove the Python setup from this job.
Also applies to: 91-105
14-14: Review the timeout duration for E2E testsThe current timeout of 60 minutes for E2E tests seems quite long. While comprehensive testing is important, such a long duration might indicate potential performance issues or inefficiencies in the test suite.
To investigate this, you can run the following script to check the actual duration of your E2E tests:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze E2E test duration from previous workflow runs # Fetch the last 10 workflow runs for the E2E Tests workflow gh run list --workflow=e2e.yml --limit 10 --json durationMs,conclusion -q '.[] | select(.conclusion == "success") | .durationMs' | \ awk '{sum+=$1; count++} END {if (count > 0) print "Average duration: " sum/(count*60000) " minutes over " count " successful runs"}'This script uses the GitHub CLI to fetch the duration of the last 10 successful E2E test runs and calculates the average. If the average is significantly less than 60 minutes, consider reducing the timeout to a more appropriate value.
130-131: Verify E2E test command and environment setupThe test command has been updated to run Playwright tests specifically for TypeScript. Ensure that this command correctly targets all necessary TypeScript E2E tests and that the environment variables provided are sufficient for these tests.
To verify the test command and environment setup, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze TypeScript E2E test setup # Check the e2e:typescript script in package.json echo "e2e:typescript script from package.json:" jq '.scripts["e2e:typescript"]' package.json # List TypeScript test files echo -e "\nTypeScript E2E test files:" fd -e ts -e tsx -p tests/e2e # Check for environment variable usage in TypeScript tests echo -e "\nEnvironment variables used in TypeScript E2E tests:" rg -t ts "process\.env\." tests/e2eThis script will help you verify that:
- The
e2e:typescriptscript inpackage.jsoncorrectly targets TypeScript tests.- All TypeScript E2E test files are included in the test run.
- All necessary environment variables are being used in the tests.
Ensure that the results align with your expectations for the TypeScript E2E tests.
14-14: Verify the necessity of using both Poetry and pnpmThe job setup includes both Poetry (for Python) and pnpm (for Node.js). While this might be necessary for your project structure, it's worth verifying if both package managers are required for the E2E tests. If possible, simplifying to use only one package manager could streamline the setup process.
To help verify the necessity of both package managers, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify the Python and Node.js dependencies used in the project, allowing you to assess whether both Poetry and pnpm are necessary for the E2E tests.
Also applies to: 35-38, 40-46
✅ Verification successful
Both Poetry and pnpm are necessary for the E2E tests.
pnpmis essential for managing Node.js dependencies and executing the E2E workflow scripts as defined in.github/workflows/e2e.yml.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python and Node.js dependencies # Check for pyproject.toml (Poetry) and package.json (pnpm) files echo "Checking for dependency files:" fd -t f "(pyproject.toml|package.json)" -x echo "Found: {}" # List Python imports in the project echo -e "\nPython imports used in the project:" rg -t py "^import|^from.*import" --no-filename | sort -u # List Node.js requires/imports in the project echo -e "\nNode.js requires/imports used in the project:" rg -t js "(require\(|import.*from)" --no-filename | sort -uLength of output: 687
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python and Node.js dependencies # Check for pyproject.toml (Poetry) and package.json (pnpm) files echo "Checking for dependency files:" fd -t f "(pyproject.toml|package.json)" -x echo "Found: {}" # List Python imports in the project echo -e "\nPython imports used in the project:" rg -t py "^import|^from.*import" --no-filename | sort -u # List Node.js requires/imports in the project echo -e "\nNode.js requires/imports used in the project:" rg -t js 'require\(|import.*from' --no-filename | sort -uLength of output: 9817
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python and Node.js dependencies with corrected regex # Check for pyproject.toml (Poetry) and package.json (pnpm) files echo "Checking for dependency files:" fd -t f -e pyproject.toml -e package.json | while read -r file; do echo "Found: $file" done # List Python imports in the project echo -e "\nPython imports used in the project:" rg -t py '^(import|from).*import' --no-filename | sort -u # List Node.js requires/imports in the project echo -e "\nNode.js requires/imports used in the project:" rg -t js 'require\(|import\s.*from' --no-filename | sort -uLength of output: 9192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify pnpm usage in E2E workflow and scripts # Check for pnpm commands in the E2E GitHub workflow echo "Checking for pnpm usage in .github/workflows/e2e.yml:" rg 'pnpm' .github/workflows/e2e.yml || echo "No pnpm usage found in e2e.yml" # Search for pnpm commands in E2E test scripts echo -e "\nChecking for pnpm usage in E2E test scripts:" rg 'pnpm' tests/e2e/**/*.*Length of output: 817
e2e/typescript/resolve_dependencies.spec.ts (3)
1-29: Imports and initial configurations are correctly set upThe import statements and the initial configuration of environment variables and constants are properly implemented and follow best practices.
31-45: Test suite and test cases are well-structuredThe test descriptions and iteration over the vector databases are clear and effectively organize the test executions.
46-106: Overall, therunTestfunction is well-implementedThe
runTestfunction correctly handles the setup, execution, and validation of each test scenario. The use of asynchronous functions and proper error handling ensures reliable test outcomes.
|
@marcusschiesser Looking great! But the pipeline failed. I guess it's an error from the new TypeScript version again? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat-upload.controller.ts (1)
17-21: Approve changes with a suggestion for improved error reporting.The additional error handling for the
indexis a good improvement. It prevents potential null pointer exceptions and provides a clear response when the data source cannot be retrieved.Consider enhancing the error reporting by including more details about why the data source retrieval failed. This could be achieved by modifying the
getDataSourcefunction to return an object with both the index and an error message when applicable. Here's a suggested implementation:const { index, error } = await getDataSource(params); if (!index) { return res.status(500).json({ error: error || "Failed to get data source", }); }This change would provide more specific information about the failure, aiding in debugging and improving the API's usability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat-upload.controller.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat-upload.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
templates/**: For files under thetemplatesfolder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/types/streaming/express/src/controllers/chat-upload.controller.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
New Features