simplify questions asked #370
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to import paths across multiple provider files and other modules, reflecting a restructuring of the codebase. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
questions/index.ts (2)
7-11: LGTM: Function declaration and CI check are well-implemented.The function signature is clear, and the use of async/await is correct. The CI environment check is a good practice for handling different execution contexts.
Consider adding a newline before the
ifstatement to improve readability:export const askQuestions = async ( program: QuestionArgs, ): Promise<QuestionResults> => { + if (ciInfo.isCI) { return await getCIQuestionResults(program); }
1-18: Summary: Good structure, but needs improvements in type safety and implementation details.Overall, the
askQuestionsfunction provides a good centralized approach to handling different types of questions. However, there are several areas that need attention:
- Address the TODO comment for refactoring pro questions.
- Improve type safety by eliminating or minimizing type assertions.
- Ensure that the returned objects correctly match the
QuestionResultstype.- Consider adding more robust error handling.
These improvements will enhance the reliability and maintainability of the code. Great job on the initial implementation, and with these refinements, it will be even better!
Consider creating separate mapper functions for each question type to ensure type safety and make the code more modular. This approach will make it easier to maintain and extend the functionality in the future.
questions/ci.ts (2)
4-16: LGTM: Default values are well-defined, but consider clarifyingcommunityProjectConfig.The
defaultsobject is well-structured and uses appropriate TypeScript features. However, thecommunityProjectConfigis set toundefined. Consider adding a comment explaining why this is the default value or if it should be initialized differently.
18-30: LGTM: Function is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The
getCIQuestionResultsfunction effectively combines default values with user-provided arguments and asynchronously fetches themodelConfig. This approach ensures a comprehensive result object.However, consider adding error handling for the
askModelConfigcall. If this function fails, it could lead to unhandled promise rejections.Consider wrapping the
askModelConfigcall in a try-catch block:export async function getCIQuestionResults( program: QuestionArgs, ): Promise<QuestionResults> { try { const modelConfig = await askModelConfig({ openAiKey: program.openAiKey, askModels: false, framework: defaults.framework, }); return { ...defaults, ...program, modelConfig, }; } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to get model config:', error); throw error; // or handle it as appropriate for your use case } }questions/stores.ts (3)
6-20: LGTM: Well-structured choices array with good variety.The function signature and choices array are well-defined. The inclusion of a "none" option provides flexibility for users who don't need a vector database.
Consider extracting the choices array to a separate constant for improved maintainability. This would allow easier updates to the list of supported databases in the future.
const VECTOR_DB_CHOICES = [ { title: "No, just store the data in the file system", value: "none" }, { title: "MongoDB", value: "mongo" }, // ... other choices ]; export const getVectorDbChoices = (framework: TemplateFramework) => { const choices = VECTOR_DB_CHOICES; // ... rest of the function };
22-25: LGTM: Clear language determination and proper path construction.The language determination logic is straightforward, and the use of
path.joinfor constructing paths ensures cross-platform compatibility.To improve robustness, consider adding a check to ensure the
vectordbPathexists before proceeding. This can help prevent errors if the expected directory structure changes:const vectordbPath = path.join(compPath, "vectordbs", vectordbLang); if (!fs.existsSync(vectordbPath)) { throw new Error(`Vector database templates not found for ${vectordbLang}`); }
26-35: LGTM: Effective directory reading and choice filtering.The function correctly reads the directory contents and filters the choices based on available options. The synchronous file operations are appropriate in this context.
To improve performance, especially for larger directories, consider using the more efficient
fs.readdirSyncwith thewithFileTypesoption. This eliminates the need for separatefs.statSynccalls:const availableChoices = fs .readdirSync(vectordbPath, { withFileTypes: true }) .filter((dirent) => dirent.isDirectory()) .map((dirent) => dirent.name);This change reduces the number of file system operations, potentially improving performance.
questions/datasources.ts (2)
13-38: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Initial setup looks good.The early return for LlamaCloud and the initial choices setup are well-implemented. However, there's a minor inconsistency in checking
selectedDataSource.Consider simplifying the condition on line 26:
-if (selectedDataSource === undefined || selectedDataSource.length === 0) { +if (!selectedDataSource?.length) {This change makes the condition more concise and consistent with the check on line 68.
40-55: LGTM: Platform-specific choices are well-handled.The implementation of platform-specific choices is clear and well-commented. The use of template literals for file types is good for maintainability.
Consider extracting the platform check into a constant for better readability:
const isLinux = process.platform === 'linux'; const isWindows = process.platform === 'win32'; // Then use these constants in your conditions if (!isLinux) { // ... } // ... title: isWindows ? "Use a local folder" : "Use local folders",This change would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
package.json (1)
61-61: LGTM: Prompts package updatedThe update of the Prompts package from 2.1.0 to 2.4.2 is a minor version change, which is less likely to introduce breaking changes. This change is approved.
For completeness, it would be beneficial to review the Prompts changelog for any new features or bug fixes that might be relevant to the project. This could potentially improve the user experience or resolve any existing issues.
helpers/providers/ollama.ts (1)
Line range hint
14-14: Consider creating an issue for the TODO commentThere's a TODO comment about getting embedding vector dimensions from the Ollama SDK. This could be an opportunity for future improvement.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO item for future implementation?
questions/simple.ts (2)
35-50: Consider prompting for language selection for all app typesThe current implementation skips the language selection prompt when
appTypeis"extractor", defaultinglanguageto"fastapi". If users might prefer a different language or framework for the extractor app, consider prompting for language selection regardless of theappType.Apply this diff to always prompt for language:
35 let language: TemplateFramework = "fastapi"; -36 - if (appType !== "extractor") { 37 const res = await prompts( 38 { 39 type: "select", 40 name: "language", 41 message: "What language do you want to use?", 42 choices: [ 43 { title: "Python (FastAPI)", value: "fastapi" }, 44 { title: "Typescript (NextJS)", value: "nextjs" }, 45 ], 46 }, 47 questionHandlers, 48 ); 49 language = res.language; -50 - }
90-105: Ensure the correct tools are assigned for each app typePlease verify that the tools assigned in the
lookuptable correspond appropriately to eachappType. For example:
- For the
"rag"app type, only"duckduckgo"is included. Should other tools be considered?- For the
"multiagent"app type, tools like"document_generator"and"img_gen"are included. Confirm that these are necessary and relevant.questions/utils.ts (3)
58-76: Enhance OS Platform Detection and SupportThe current implementation supports only Windows (
win32) and macOS (darwin), exiting the process for other platforms.Consider implementing support for Linux platforms or providing a fallback mechanism to allow users on unsupported systems to manually input paths.
100-103: Clarify Error MessagesThe error message in the catch block is generic.
Consider providing more context or guidance to the user:
console.log( red( - "Got an error when trying to select local context data! Please try again or select another data source option.", + "An unexpected error occurred while selecting local context data. Please try again or choose a different data source option.", ), );
121-126: Consistent Logging inquestionHandlersIn the
onCancelhandler,console.error("Exiting.");is used. Ensure consistent logging practices throughout the codebase, such as usingconsole.logor a logging library, and consistent message formatting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
- helpers/providers/anthropic.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/azure.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/gemini.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/groq.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/index.ts (2 hunks)
- helpers/providers/llmhub.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/mistral.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/ollama.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/providers/openai.ts (1 hunks)
- index.ts (8 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- questions.ts (0 hunks)
- questions/ci.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/datasources.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/index.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/questions.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/simple.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/stores.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/types.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- questions.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- helpers/providers/anthropic.ts
- helpers/providers/azure.ts
- helpers/providers/groq.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
index.ts
[error] 257-257: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 259-259: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 261-261: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (30)
questions/types.ts (4)
3-6: LGTM: QuestionResults type definition is well-structured.The
QuestionResultstype is correctly defined using theOmitutility type. It appropriately creates a subset ofInstallAppArgsby excluding properties that are likely not relevant for question results.
8-12: LGTM: PureQuestionArgs type definition is clear and flexible.The
PureQuestionArgstype is well-defined with appropriate optional properties. The boolean flags foraskModelsandpro, along with theopenAiKeystring, provide a good structure for handling various question-related scenarios.
14-14: LGTM: QuestionArgs type effectively combines QuestionResults and PureQuestionArgs.The
QuestionArgstype is well-defined using the intersection operator to mergeQuestionResultsandPureQuestionArgs. This composition creates a comprehensive type that includes all properties from both source types, which is likely useful for functions that need access to all question-related data.
1-14: LGTM: File structure and type definitions are well-organized and consistent.The
questions/types.tsfile is well-structured with clear, related type definitions. The naming conventions are consistent, and the types are appropriately exported for use in other modules. The file name accurately reflects its contents, containing only type definitions related to questions.tsconfig.json (1)
21-21: LGTM! Verify the new questions module structure.The change from
"questions.ts"to"./questions"in theincludearray is correct and aligns with the PR objective of simplifying questions. This update suggests a restructuring of the questions module, potentially splitting it into multiple files for better organization.To ensure the new structure is correctly set up, please run the following verification script:
This script will help confirm that the questions module has been properly restructured and that there are no leftover files from the previous structure.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! The questions module structure has been updated correctly.
The
questionsdirectory exists and containsquestions.ts, ensuring that the include path intsconfig.jsonis correctly pointing to the updated module structure.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of the questions module # Check if the questions directory exists if [ -d "./questions" ]; then echo "Questions directory exists." # List the contents of the questions directory echo "Contents of the questions directory:" ls -la ./questions else echo "Error: Questions directory not found." fi # Check for any remaining questions.ts file in the root if [ -f "./questions.ts" ]; then echo "Warning: questions.ts still exists in the root directory. Consider removing it if it's no longer needed." fiLength of output: 826
questions/index.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM: Import statements are well-structured.The import statements are clear, concise, and relevant to the file's purpose. Good job on separating type imports, which enhances code readability and maintainability.
17-17:⚠️ Potential issueImprove type safety in simple questions handling.
The use of type assertion (
as unknown as QuestionArgs) suggests a potential type mismatch between theprogramparameter and the expected input ofaskSimpleQuestions.Consider the following improvements:
- Review the type definitions of
QuestionArgsand the input type expected byaskSimpleQuestions.- If possible, align these types to avoid the need for type assertions.
- If the types cannot be aligned, consider creating a proper mapping function to convert between types safely.
Here's a potential refactor (adjust based on actual type definitions):
return await askSimpleQuestions(mapToSimpleQuestionArgs(program)); // Add this function to safely map between types function mapToSimpleQuestionArgs(args: QuestionArgs): SimpleQuestionArgs { // Implement proper mapping logic here return { // map relevant fields }; }Let's check the definition of the
askSimpleQuestionsfunction to understand its expected input type:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of askSimpleQuestions function # Test: Search for askSimpleQuestions function definition echo "askSimpleQuestions definition:" rg --type typescript "function askSimpleQuestions" -A 5
12-16:⚠️ Potential issueAddress TODO and improve type safety in pro questions handling.
There are several issues in this section that need attention:
- The TODO comment indicates that refactoring is needed for pro questions.
- The use of type assertions (
as unknown as) suggests potential type mismatches.- Returning
programasQuestionResultsmight not be type-safe or correct.Consider the following improvements:
- Implement the refactoring mentioned in the TODO comment to return a proper result object.
- Review and align the types between
QuestionArgsand the return type ofaskProQuestionsto avoid type assertions.- Ensure that the returned object matches the
QuestionResultstype.Here's a potential refactor (note that this is a suggestion and may need adjustment based on the actual types):
else if (program.pro) { const proResults = await askProQuestions(program); return { ...proResults, // Add any additional fields required by QuestionResults }; }To better understand the types involved, let's check their definitions:
questions/ci.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly bringing in the necessary types and helper functions from related modules.
1-30: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The new
getCIQuestionResultsfunction effectively simplifies the process of gathering question results for CI by:
- Providing sensible defaults
- Merging these defaults with user-provided arguments
- Asynchronously fetching the model configuration
This implementation aligns well with the PR objective of simplifying questions asked. It reduces the amount of information that needs to be provided by the user while still allowing for customization.
questions/stores.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The necessary modules are imported, and there are no unused imports. The specific import of
TemplateFrameworkfrom "../helpers" is a good practice.
1-35: Overall: Well-implemented function that aligns with PR objectives.The
getVectorDbChoicesfunction effectively simplifies the process of determining available vector database options based on the given framework. This aligns well with the PR objective of simplifying questions asked.Key strengths:
- Clear and concise implementation
- Flexibility in database choices, including a "none" option
- Framework-specific language determination
- Proper use of file system operations
The suggested improvements are minor and focus on maintainability and performance optimizations. Great job on this implementation!
questions/datasources.ts (4)
1-12: LGTM: Imports and function signature are well-defined.The import statements and function signature are clear, concise, and use appropriate TypeScript types. This sets a good foundation for the function implementation.
57-66: LGTM: Framework-specific choices are well-implemented.The addition of framework-specific choices for "fastapi" is clear and concise. The exclusion of these options for the "extractor" template is appropriate, and the comments provide useful information about the requirements for each option.
68-75: LGTM: Final option and return statement are correct.The addition of the LlamaCloud option under specific conditions is well-implemented. The return statement correctly provides the constructed choices array.
1-75: Great job overall: Function is well-structured and handles various scenarios effectively.The
getDataSourceChoicesfunction is well-implemented, covering different platforms, frameworks, and user scenarios. The code is readable and maintainable, with only minor suggestions for improvement provided in previous comments.To ensure the reliability of this new function, it would be beneficial to verify its test coverage. Run the following command to check for existing tests:
If no tests are found, consider adding unit tests to cover various scenarios handled by this function.
helpers/providers/mistral.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM. Verify import path consistency across the project.The updated import path looks good and aligns with the reported restructuring of the module organization. This change should improve clarity and maintainability.
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any remaining imports from the old path:
Consider updating any relevant project documentation to reflect this change in the module structure, if you haven't already done so.
✅ Verification successful
Import path updated correctly and no residual imports remain.
The updated import path is consistent across the project, and no remaining imports from the old path were found. Everything looks good.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old questions path # Test: Search for imports from the old path. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript 'from\s+"../../questions"' # Test: Verify that the new import path exists. Expect: File exists. fd -e ts 'utils.ts' questionsLength of output: 133
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old questions path # Test: Search for imports from the old path. Expect: No results. rg 'from\s+"../../questions"' --type ts # Test: Verify that the new import path exists. Expect: File exists. fd -e ts 'utils.ts' questionsLength of output: 90
helpers/providers/index.ts (2)
29-29: LGTM. Verify impact on CI/CD pipelines.The simplification of the condition to only check
askModelsstreamlines the logic. This change allows for a more consistent behavior across different environments.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact CI/CD pipelines, let's verify if there are any CI-specific configurations or scripts that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for CI-related configurations that might be affected by this change # Test: Search for CI-related configuration files. Expect: List of CI configuration files, if any. fd -e yml -e yaml -e json '(\.circleci|\.github\/workflows|\.gitlab-ci|azure-pipelines|\.travis)' # Test: Search for references to 'askModels' in CI scripts or configs. Expect: Any occurrences that might need review. rg --type yaml --type json 'askModels'Please review the results of these checks to ensure that CI/CD pipelines are not adversely affected by this change.
2-2: LGTM. Verify import consistency across the codebase.The update of the import path for
questionHandlerslooks good. This change likely reflects a restructuring of the project's directory structure.To ensure consistency, let's verify if this import path change has been applied correctly across the entire codebase:
package.json (1)
52-52: Review compatibility with major Commander updateThe Commander package has been updated from version 2.20.0 to 12.1.0, which is a significant major version jump. This update likely includes breaking changes that could affect the project.
Please review the Commander changelog and ensure that the project's usage of Commander is compatible with version 12.1.0. Pay special attention to any breaking changes or deprecated features.
You can use the following script to check for Commander usage in the project:
After verifying compatibility, update any affected code as necessary.
helpers/providers/ollama.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify the new import path across the codebase.The import path change for
questionHandlersandtoChoicelooks good. This change likely reflects a restructuring of the questions module for better organization.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of this new import path:
✅ Verification successful
Import path verified and consistently used across the codebase.
No remaining imports from
"../../questions"were found. The new import path"../../questions/utils"is used in the following files:
helpers/providers/anthropic.tshelpers/providers/mistral.tshelpers/providers/groq.tshelpers/providers/azure.tshelpers/providers/ollama.tshelpers/providers/gemini.tshelpers/providers/index.tshelpers/providers/llmhub.tshelpers/providers/openai.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import path for questionHandlers and toChoice # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from "../../questions" echo "Checking for old import paths:" rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions"' # Test 2: Verify the new import path is used consistently echo "Verifying new import path usage:" rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions/utils"'Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import path for questionHandlers and toChoice # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from "../../questions" echo "Checking for old import paths:" rg 'from "\.\./\.\./questions"' --type-add 'ts=*.ts' --type-add 'tsx=*.tsx' --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Verify the new import path is used consistently echo "Verifying new import path usage:" rg 'from "\.\./\.\./questions/utils"' --type-add 'ts=*.ts' --type-add 'tsx=*.tsx' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 469
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new import path for questionHandlers and toChoice # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from "../../questions" echo "Checking for old import paths:" rg 'from "\.\./\.\./questions"' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type ts --type tsx # Test 2: Verify the new import path usage: echo "Verifying new import path usage:" rg 'from "\.\./\.\./questions/utils"' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 1173
helpers/providers/openai.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.The import path for
questionHandlershas been updated to reflect the new file structure. This change is consistent with the PR objectives of simplifying questions asked.Let's verify that this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import paths have been successfully updated across the codebase.
No remaining imports from
"../../questions"were found, and the new import path"../../questions/utils"is used consistently in all relevant files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the updated import path for questionHandlers # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for any remaining old imports..." rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions"' # Test 2: Verify the new import path is used consistently echo "Verifying new import path usage..." rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions/utils"'Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the updated import path for questionHandlers with corrected file type handling # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports from the old path echo "Checking for any remaining old imports..." rg --glob "*.ts" 'from "../../questions"' # Test 2: Verify the new import path is used consistently echo "Verifying new import path usage..." rg --glob "*.ts" 'from "../../questions/utils"'Length of output: 1089
helpers/providers/llmhub.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-180: LGTM! No other changes required.The import path change for
questionHandlersis the only modification in this file. The usage ofquestionHandlersin theaskLLMHubQuestionsfunction remains unchanged, and there are no apparent issues or inconsistencies introduced by this change.
7-7: Verify the new import path forquestionHandlers.The import path for
questionHandlershas been updated, which is likely due to a project restructuring. This change looks good, but please ensure that:
- The new path "../../questions/utils" is correct and consistent with the project's new structure.
- The
questionHandlersexported from this new location has the same interface and functionality as before.Let's verify the consistency of this import change across the project:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: New import path for
questionHandlersis correct and consistent.All instances of the old import path have been updated to
../../questions/utils, and thequestionHandlersexport is properly defined in the new location.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of questionHandlers import across the project # Test 1: Check if the new import path exists if ! fd --type file "utils.ts" questions; then echo "Error: questions/utils.ts file not found. Verify the new import path." exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining old imports if rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions"'; then echo "Warning: Found old import paths. Consider updating these:" rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions"' fi # Test 3: Check for the new import pattern echo "New import usage:" rg --type typescript 'from "../../questions/utils"' # Test 4: Verify the export of questionHandlers in the new location if ! rg --type typescript 'export.*questionHandlers' questions/utils.ts; then echo "Error: questionHandlers export not found in questions/utils.ts. Verify the export." exit 1 fi echo "Verification complete. Please review the results."Length of output: 559
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the export of questionHandlers with correct file type # Test 1: Check for the new import path existence if ! fd --type file "utils.ts" questions; then echo "Error: questions/utils.ts file not found. Verify the new import path." exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining old imports without using --type if rg 'from "../../questions"' --glob '*.ts'; then echo "Warning: Found old import paths. Consider updating these:" rg 'from "../../questions"' --glob '*.ts' fi # Test 3: Check for the new import pattern without using --type echo "New import usage:" rg 'from "../../questions/utils"' --glob '*.ts' # Test 4: Verify the export of questionHandlers in the new location using correct type if ! rg 'export.*questionHandlers' questions/utils.ts --glob '*.ts'; then echo "Error: questionHandlers export not found in questions/utils.ts. Verify the export." exit 1 fi echo "Verification complete. Please review the results."Length of output: 1225
questions/simple.ts (1)
123-123: Verify the logic for setting thefrontendflag with NextJSIn line 123, the
frontendproperty is set tofalsewhenanswers.language === "nextjs":frontend: answers.language === "nextjs" ? false : results.frontend,Since NextJS is a frontend framework, setting
frontendtofalsemight not be intended. Please confirm if this logic is correct or if it should be adjusted.questions/utils.ts (2)
107-115: Ensure Terminal Cursor Visibility on ExitThe
onPromptStatefunction re-enables the terminal cursor if the prompt is aborted. Verify that all exit paths in your application also handle the cursor state appropriately to prevent the cursor from remaining hidden.
1-8: Organize and Optimize ImportsConsider organizing the import statements alphabetically and removing any unused imports to enhance code readability and maintainability.
Run the following script to check for unused imports:
index.ts (3)
Line range hint
214-369: Ensure all options are properly initialized before use.Throughout the code, options from
program.opts()are used. Verify that all options likeoptions.port,options.externalPort, andoptions.templateare correctly initialized and have default values if necessary to prevent undefined behavior.Would you like assistance in reviewing the initialization of these options?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 257-257: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 259-259: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 261-261: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
365-369: Pass consistent parameters to therunAppfunction.Verify that the arguments passed to
runAppmatch its expected parameters, especiallyoptions.portandoptions.externalPort. Ensure that these options are correctly initialized.Run the following script to check the definition of
runAppand its usage:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of runApp and its parameter list. # Test: Search for the runApp function definition. rg --type js --type ts --pcre2 'function\s+runApp\(\s*(.*?)\)' # Expected result: Confirm that the parameters align with the arguments provided.
166-172: Verify the custom parser function for the '--tools' option is correctly placed.Ensure that the custom processing function for parsing the
--toolsoption is correctly supplied as the third argument in the.option()method, according to Commander.js syntax.Run the following script to check the placement of the parser function:
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
| import ciInfo from "ci-info"; | |||
| import prompts from "prompts"; | |||
| import { ModelConfigParams } from "."; | |||
| import { questionHandlers, toChoice } from "../../questions"; | |||
| import { questionHandlers, toChoice } from "../../questions/utils"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Import Verification Failed
The toChoice function was not found in the specified path ../../questions/utils. Please ensure that the function is correctly exported from questions/utils.ts or update the import path accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the new import path.
The import statement has been updated to a more specific path, which is a good practice for better code organization. This change should improve the modularity of the codebase.
Let's verify that the imported functions exist in the new location:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that questionHandlers and toChoice are correctly defined in the new location.
# Test: Check if the functions are defined in the new utils file
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const questionHandlers = $_' questions/utils.ts
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function toChoice($_) { $$$ }' questions/utils.ts
Length of output: 443
questions/simple.ts
Outdated
| appType, | ||
| language, | ||
| useLlamaCloud, | ||
| llamaCloudKey: process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY || "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prompt the user for the LlamaCloud API key when enabled
Currently, when useLlamaCloud is true, the llamaCloudKey is retrieved from the environment variable LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY or defaults to an empty string. If the environment variable is not set and llamaCloudKey is empty, this could lead to runtime issues when the application expects a valid key. It would be better to prompt the user for their LlamaCloud API key to ensure it's provided.
Apply this diff to prompt the user for the llamaCloudKey:
71
const results = convertAnswers({
72
appType,
73
language,
74
useLlamaCloud,
+75
+ llamaCloudKey: useLlamaCloud
+ ? (
+ await prompts(
+ {
+ type: "password",
+ name: "llamaCloudKey",
+ message: "Please enter your LlamaCloud API key:",
+ },
+ questionHandlers,
+ )
+ ).llamaCloudKey
+ : "",
-75
- llamaCloudKey: process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY || "",
76
modelConfig,
77
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| llamaCloudKey: process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY || "", | |
| useLlamaCloud, | |
| llamaCloudKey: useLlamaCloud | |
| ? ( | |
| await prompts( | |
| { | |
| type: "password", | |
| name: "llamaCloudKey", | |
| message: "Please enter your LlamaCloud API key:", | |
| }, | |
| questionHandlers, | |
| ) | |
| ).llamaCloudKey | |
| : "", | |
| modelConfig, |
questions/simple.ts
Outdated
| framework: answers.language, | ||
| ui: "shadcn", | ||
| llamaCloudKey: answers.llamaCloudKey, | ||
| useLlamaParse: answers.useLlamaCloud, | ||
| llamapack: "", | ||
| postInstallAction: "none", | ||
| dataSources: [], | ||
| vectorDb: answers.useLlamaCloud ? "llamacloud" : "none", | ||
| modelConfig: answers.modelConfig, | ||
| observability: "none", | ||
| ...results, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize the merging of results in convertAnswers
You can simplify the merging process in the convertAnswers function by restructuring the code for better readability and maintainability.
Consider restructuring the return statement:
111 return {
112 framework: answers.language,
113 ui: "shadcn",
114 llamaCloudKey: answers.llamaCloudKey,
115 useLlamaParse: answers.useLlamaCloud,
116 llamapack: "",
117 postInstallAction: "none",
118 dataSources: [],
119 vectorDb: answers.useLlamaCloud ? "llamacloud" : "none",
120 modelConfig: answers.modelConfig,
121 observability: "none",
122 ...results,
-123 frontend: answers.language === "nextjs" ? false : results.frontend,
+123 frontend:
+ answers.language === "nextjs" ? false : results.frontend || false,
124 };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| framework: answers.language, | |
| ui: "shadcn", | |
| llamaCloudKey: answers.llamaCloudKey, | |
| useLlamaParse: answers.useLlamaCloud, | |
| llamapack: "", | |
| postInstallAction: "none", | |
| dataSources: [], | |
| vectorDb: answers.useLlamaCloud ? "llamacloud" : "none", | |
| modelConfig: answers.modelConfig, | |
| observability: "none", | |
| ...results, | |
| framework: answers.language, | |
| ui: "shadcn", | |
| llamaCloudKey: answers.llamaCloudKey, | |
| useLlamaParse: answers.useLlamaCloud, | |
| llamapack: "", | |
| postInstallAction: "none", | |
| dataSources: [], | |
| vectorDb: answers.useLlamaCloud ? "llamacloud" : "none", | |
| modelConfig: answers.modelConfig, | |
| observability: "none", | |
| ...results, | |
| frontend: | |
| answers.language === "nextjs" ? false : results.frontend || false, |
questions/questions.ts
Outdated
| program.framework === "express" | ||
| ? "Express " | ||
| : program.framework === "fastapi" | ||
| ? "FastAPI (Python) " | ||
| : "", | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Nested Ternary Operators for Readability
The nested ternary operators in the definition of styledBackend can be difficult to read and understand. Consider refactoring to improve readability. For example, you can use a simple if-else statement or a lookup map.
Apply this change:
- const styledBackend = green(
- program.framework === "express"
- ? "Express "
- : program.framework === "fastapi"
- ? "FastAPI (Python) "
- : "",
- );
+ const backendName =
+ program.framework === "express"
+ ? "Express "
+ : program.framework === "fastapi"
+ ? "FastAPI (Python) "
+ : "";
+ const styledBackend = green(backendName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| program.framework === "express" | |
| ? "Express " | |
| : program.framework === "fastapi" | |
| ? "FastAPI (Python) " | |
| : "", | |
| ); | |
| const backendName = | |
| program.framework === "express" | |
| ? "Express " | |
| : program.framework === "fastify" | |
| ? "FastAPI (Python) " | |
| : ""; | |
| const styledBackend = green(backendName); |
questions/questions.ts
Outdated
| const isUsingLlamaCloud = program.dataSources.some( | ||
| (ds) => ds.type === "llamacloud", | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Asking for LlamaParse if user selected file data source | ||
| if (isUsingLlamaCloud) { | ||
| // default to use LlamaParse if using LlamaCloud | ||
| program.useLlamaParse = true; | ||
| } else { | ||
| // Extractor template doesn't support LlamaParse and LlamaCloud right now (cannot use asyncio loop in Reflex) | ||
| if ( | ||
| program.useLlamaParse === undefined && | ||
| program.template !== "extractor" | ||
| ) { | ||
| // if already set useLlamaParse, don't ask again | ||
| if (program.dataSources.some((ds) => ds.type === "file")) { | ||
| const { useLlamaParse } = await prompts( | ||
| { | ||
| type: "toggle", | ||
| name: "useLlamaParse", | ||
| message: | ||
| "Would you like to use LlamaParse (improved parser for RAG - requires API key)?", | ||
| initial: false, | ||
| active: "Yes", | ||
| inactive: "No", | ||
| }, | ||
| questionHandlers, | ||
| ); | ||
| program.useLlamaParse = useLlamaParse; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Ask for LlamaCloud API key when using a LlamaCloud index or LlamaParse | ||
| if (isUsingLlamaCloud || program.useLlamaParse) { | ||
| if (!program.llamaCloudKey) { | ||
| // if already set, don't ask again | ||
| // Ask for LlamaCloud API key | ||
| const { llamaCloudKey } = await prompts( | ||
| { | ||
| type: "text", | ||
| name: "llamaCloudKey", | ||
| message: | ||
| "Please provide your LlamaCloud API key (leave blank to skip):", | ||
| }, | ||
| questionHandlers, | ||
| ); | ||
| program.llamaCloudKey = llamaCloudKey || process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Environment Variables Are Properly Utilized
In the section where you prompt for the llamaCloudKey, you assign program.llamaCloudKey to either the user input or the environment variable LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY. However, if the user provides an empty string, program.llamaCloudKey might be set to an empty value even if the environment variable is available. Consider checking for a valid input before falling back to the environment variable.
Apply this change:
program.llamaCloudKey = llamaCloudKey || process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY;
+ if (!program.llamaCloudKey) {
+ console.warn("LlamaCloud API key is required for this configuration.");
+ }This ensures that program.llamaCloudKey is appropriately set and warns the user if it's missing.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
questions/simple.ts (2)
9-9: Address the TODO comment for data source configuration.The TODO comment indicates that data source configuration is not yet implemented. Consider creating a separate task or issue to track this feature implementation.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of data source configuration?
67-80: Consider adding validation for the LlamaCloud API key.While the LlamaCloud API key handling has been improved, there's currently no validation for the key format. Consider adding a simple validation check to ensure the provided key meets the expected format before proceeding.
Here's a suggestion for adding basic validation:
const isValidApiKey = (key: string) => /^llama_[a-zA-Z0-9]{32}$/.test(key); if (llamaCloudKey && !isValidApiKey(llamaCloudKey)) { console.warn("The provided LlamaCloud API key may be invalid. Please check and try again."); // Optionally, you could re-prompt the user or set llamaCloudKey to undefined }questions/questions.ts (6)
20-93: LGTM: Template selection logic is well-implementedThe template selection logic is well-structured and efficiently handles different cases. Early returns for specific templates improve the flow by avoiding unnecessary prompts.
Consider extracting the template choices into a constant array at the top of the file for better maintainability:
const TEMPLATE_CHOICES = [ { title: "Agentic RAG (e.g. chat with docs)", value: "streaming" }, { title: "Multi-agent app (using workflows)", value: "multiagent" }, { title: "Structured Extractor", value: "extractor" }, { title: "Community template from ${styledRepo}", value: "community" }, { title: "Example using a LlamaPack", value: "llamapack" }, ];Then use
choices: TEMPLATE_CHOICESin the prompts options.
94-155: LGTM: Framework and frontend selection logic is comprehensiveThe framework selection and frontend generation logic covers all necessary cases and provides a good user experience with colored output.
Consider refactoring the nested ternary operator for
styledBackendto improve readability:const getBackendName = (framework: string) => { switch (framework) { case "express": return "Express "; case "fastapi": return "FastAPI (Python) "; default: return ""; } }; const styledBackend = green(getBackendName(program.framework));This approach is more maintainable and easier to extend if more frameworks are added in the future.
186-313: LGTM: Data source selection logic is comprehensiveThe data source selection logic handles various types well and allows for multiple selections.
Consider the following improvements:
Database connection string validation:
The current validation is restrictive. Consider using a more flexible regex pattern or a dedicated URL parsing library to validate database connection strings.Web scraping depth:
Allow users to customize the scraping depth for web data sources. You can add a prompt for depth:const { depth } = await prompts({ type: 'number', name: 'depth', message: 'Enter the depth for web scraping (1-5):', initial: 1, min: 1, max: 5 }); program.dataSources.push({ type: "web", config: { baseUrl, prefix: baseUrl, depth, }, });These changes will provide more flexibility for users with different database setups and allow for more control over web scraping.
314-382: LGTM: LlamaParse and LlamaCloud configuration logic is well-implementedThe configuration logic for LlamaParse and LlamaCloud is comprehensive and handles different scenarios appropriately. The vector database selection is correctly managed based on the chosen data sources.
Consider improving the security and user experience when asking for the LlamaCloud API key:
- Use a password input type to mask the API key:
const { llamaCloudKey } = await prompts({ type: 'password', name: 'llamaCloudKey', message: 'Please provide your LlamaCloud API key (leave blank to skip):', });
- Add basic validation for the API key format:
validate: (value) => { if (value && !/^llama_[a-zA-Z0-9]{32}$/.test(value)) { return 'Invalid API key format. It should start with "llama_" followed by 32 alphanumeric characters.'; } return true; }These changes will enhance security by not displaying the API key and provide immediate feedback on the key format.
383-409: LGTM: Tools selection and post-install action logic is well-implementedThe tool selection logic for "streaming" and "multiagent" templates is well-implemented, filtering tools based on the selected framework. The use of
multiselectfor tool selection provides a good user experience.Consider adding a check for the case where no tools are selected:
if (toolsName && toolsName.length > 0) { const tools = toolsName.map((tool: string) => supportedTools.find((t) => t.name === tool) ).filter(Boolean); // Filter out any undefined values program.tools = tools; } else { program.tools = []; // Explicitly set to an empty array when no tools are selected }This change ensures that
program.toolsis always defined, even when no tools are selected, which can simplify downstream logic.
1-409: Overall assessment: Well-implemented but with room for improvementThe
askProQuestionsfunction provides a comprehensive and interactive way to configure project settings. It covers various aspects such as template selection, framework choice, data sources, and tool selection, making it a versatile solution for project setup.While the implementation is thorough, consider the following architectural improvements:
Modularity: Break down the large
askProQuestionsfunction into smaller, focused functions. This will improve readability and maintainability.Configuration objects: Use configuration objects to group related settings, making it easier to manage and extend the questionnaire.
Factory pattern: Implement a factory pattern for creating data source configurations, which can help in managing the growing number of data source types.
Error handling: Implement more robust error handling throughout the function, especially for user inputs and API interactions.
Testing: Given the complexity of this function, consider adding unit tests for individual components and integration tests for the entire flow.
These improvements will enhance the overall quality, maintainability, and extensibility of the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- questions/questions.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/simple.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/types.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- questions/types.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
questions/simple.ts (4)
1-8: LGTM: Imports and type definitions look good.The imports and type definitions are well-structured and provide a solid foundation for the rest of the code.
Also applies to: 10-17
19-66: LGTM: askSimpleQuestions function is well-structured.The function is logically organized and handles various scenarios effectively. It properly integrates with other helper functions and provides a good user experience through interactive prompts.
Also applies to: 81-98
100-139: LGTM: convertAnswers function is well-implemented.The function effectively uses a lookup table for app-type-specific configurations and correctly merges additional settings. The structure is clean and easy to maintain.
Also applies to: 141-142
1-142: Overall, the implementation effectively simplifies the question-asking process.The
questions/simple.tsfile successfully implements a streamlined approach to gathering user input for application configuration. It aligns well with the PR objective of simplifying questions asked. The code is well-structured, making use of appropriate types and helper functions. With the suggested minor improvements, this implementation will provide a robust and user-friendly configuration setup process.questions/questions.ts (2)
1-19: LGTM: Imports and function signature are well-structuredThe imports are organized and relevant to the function's purpose. The
askProQuestionsfunction signature is clear and properly typed.
156-185: LGTM: Observability and model configuration logic is well-implementedThe observability setup for the "streaming" template and the model configuration logic are implemented correctly. The framework-dependent observability choices provide good flexibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
helpers/types.ts (1)
Line range hint
20-32: Consider updating TemplateVectorDB for consistencyWhile "llamacloud" has been removed from
TemplateDataSourceType, it's still present in theTemplateVectorDBtype. This inconsistency might lead to confusion or potential errors.Consider whether "llamacloud" should also be removed from
TemplateVectorDBfor consistency:export type TemplateVectorDB = | "none" | "mongo" | "pg" | "pinecone" | "milvus" | "astra" | "qdrant" | "chroma" - | "llamacloud" | "weaviate";If "llamacloud" is still a valid option for vector databases but not for data sources, please add a comment explaining this distinction to improve code clarity.
questions/simple.ts (1)
18-97: Good improvements toaskSimpleQuestions, consider enhancing error handling.The function structure is logical and follows a clear flow. The LlamaCloud API key handling has been improved as suggested in a previous comment. However, consider enhancing the error handling for the API key input.
Consider adding a validation check for the LlamaCloud API key:
if (useLlamaCloud && !llamaCloudKey) { let isValidKey = false; while (!isValidKey) { const { llamaCloudKey: newLlamaCloudKey } = await prompts( { type: "text", name: "llamaCloudKey", message: "Please provide your LlamaCloud API key (leave blank to skip):", }, questionHandlers, ); llamaCloudKey = newLlamaCloudKey || process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY; // Add a simple validation (e.g., checking if it's not empty and has a minimum length) isValidKey = llamaCloudKey && llamaCloudKey.length >= 32; if (!isValidKey && llamaCloudKey) { console.log("Invalid API key. Please try again."); } else if (!llamaCloudKey) { console.log("No API key provided. Proceeding without LlamaCloud."); break; } } }This change adds a simple validation loop to ensure a valid API key is provided when using LlamaCloud.
index.ts (3)
201-201: LGTM: New options for advanced features.The addition of
--ask-modelsand--prooptions is a good enhancement, likely enabling advanced features or interactive prompts. Setting these tofalseby default maintains backwards compatibility.Consider updating the project's documentation to explain these new options and their implications for users.
Also applies to: 204-204, 207-207, 209-209
223-223: LGTM: Enhanced data source handling.The additions to data source handling, including support for web sources and database sources, significantly improve the flexibility of the application. This structure allows users to easily specify different types of data sources and sets the groundwork for adding more source types in the future.
Consider refactoring this section into a separate function for better maintainability. For example:
function configureDataSources(options) { if (process.argv.includes("--no-files")) { return []; } if (process.argv.includes("--example-file")) { return getDataSources(options.files, options.exampleFile); } // ... other conditions ... } options.dataSources = configureDataSources(options);This refactoring would improve readability and make it easier to add new data source types in the future.
Also applies to: 225-225, 227-228, 230-235, 241-246
332-332: LGTM: Enhanced post-installation actions.The additions to post-installation actions, including the "VSCode" option and the updated "runApp" with additional parameters, provide users with more flexibility after installation. This is a good improvement that allows for a more tailored setup process.
Consider updating the project's documentation to explain these new post-installation options and their implications for users. This will help users understand and utilize these new features effectively.
Also applies to: 356-364
helpers/python.ts (1)
96-101: LGTM! Consider a minor consistency improvement.The addition of the "llamacloud" case in the vector database switch statement is well-implemented and consistent with the existing structure. It correctly adds the necessary dependency for the LlamaCloud managed index.
For consistency with other cases, consider adding a newline before the
breakstatement:case "llamacloud": dependencies.push({ name: "llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud", version: "^0.3.1", }); + break;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- helpers/python.ts (1 hunks)
- helpers/types.ts (1 hunks)
- index.ts (8 hunks)
- questions/ci.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/datasources.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/index.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/questions.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/simple.ts (1 hunks)
- questions/stores.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- questions/ci.ts
- questions/datasources.ts
- questions/index.ts
- questions/questions.ts
- questions/stores.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
index.ts
[error] 252-252: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 254-254: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 256-256: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
helpers/types.ts (1)
49-49: Verify the impact of removing "llamacloud" from TemplateDataSourceTypeThe
TemplateDataSourceTypehas been updated to remove the "llamacloud" option. This change simplifies the type definition, which is in line with the PR objective to "simplify questions asked".However, we need to ensure that this change doesn't break any existing functionality.
Let's verify if there are any remaining references to "llamacloud" as a data source type:
If these searches return any results, we may need to update those occurrences to maintain consistency with this type change.
questions/simple.ts (4)
1-17: Imports and type definitions look good.The imports are appropriate for the file's functionality, and the type definitions for
AppTypeandSimpleAnswersare clear and well-structured.
99-133: Well-structuredconvertAnswersfunction and lookup table.The use of a lookup table to map app types to specific configurations is an efficient approach that enhances code maintainability. The configurations for each app type appear appropriate and well-defined.
134-147: Reconsider thefrontendproperty assignment.The return statement is comprehensive and includes all necessary properties. However, the handling of the
frontendproperty on line 146 should be reconsidered.As mentioned in a previous comment, the current assignment of the
frontendproperty may lead to unexpected behavior. Consider revising this line to make the logic more explicit and future-proof:frontend: answers.language === "nextjs" ? false : (results.frontend ?? false),This change ensures that for non-NextJS frameworks, if
results.frontendis undefined, it defaults tofalse.
1-148: Overall, well-structured and efficient implementation.This file implements a streamlined process for gathering user input for app configuration, handling various app types and configurations efficiently. The code is well-organized, with clear type definitions and logical function structures. Previous review comments have been largely addressed, with only minor improvements suggested in this review.
index.ts (5)
3-3: LGTM: Import statements updated for better modularity.The changes to the import statements, including the switch to named import for
Commandand the restructuring of thequestionsmodule imports, improve code organization and align with modern ES6+ practices.Also applies to: 19-21
32-32: LGTM: Improved CLI argument handling.The changes to make the project directory argument optional and the corresponding update to the usage message enhance the flexibility of the CLI. This allows users to run the command without specifying a project directory upfront, which can be beneficial in certain workflows.
Also applies to: 34-35, 37-39
166-172: LGTM: Improved tools option handling.The changes to the
--toolsoption handling are well-implemented. The addition of the "none" option and the use of a callback function to process the input immediately improve the flexibility and usability of this option. This approach allows users to easily specify no tools or a list of tools as needed.
213-215: LGTM: Improved options handling.The creation of a centralized
optionsobject fromprogram.opts()is a good refactoring. This change enhances code maintainability and potentially improves performance by avoiding repeated calls toprogram.opts(). It also makes the code more readable by clearly separating CLI parsing from option usage.
326-329: LGTM: ImprovedcreateAppfunction call.The changes to the
createAppfunction call, using the spread operator foranswersand passing additional properties directly, improve the flexibility of the function. This approach allows for easy addition or removal of properties in the future while ensuring that specific properties (likeappPath,packageManager, andexternalPort) are not accidentally overwritten byanswers.
| preferences, | ||
| program.openAiKey, | ||
| ); | ||
| const answers = await askQuestions(options as unknown as QuestionArgs); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve type safety in askQuestions function call.
The current implementation uses type casting, which could potentially hide type mismatches and reduce type safety.
Consider refactoring this to avoid the use of type casting. Here are a couple of approaches:
- Ensure that
optionsconforms to theQuestionArgsinterface:
const questionArgs: QuestionArgs = {
// Map relevant properties from options to QuestionArgs
};
const answers = await askQuestions(questionArgs);- Update the
askQuestionsfunction to accept a more general type that includes all properties ofoptions:
function askQuestions(options: Partial<QuestionArgs> & Record<string, unknown>): Promise<Answers> {
// Implementation
}
const answers = await askQuestions(options);These approaches would maintain type safety and make the code more robust.
| Generate a frontend for your backend. | ||
| `, | ||
| ) | ||
| .option( | ||
| "--no-frontend", | ||
| ` | ||
|
|
||
| Do not generate a frontend for your backend. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve new frontend options, but fix formatting.
The addition of --frontend and --no-frontend options provides users with more control over frontend generation, which is a good improvement. However, the formatting of these options is inconsistent with other options in the file.
Please apply the following diff to correct the formatting:
.option(
"--frontend",
- `
- Generate a frontend for your backend.
-`,
+ `
+
+ Generate a frontend for your backend.
+`
)
.option(
"--no-frontend",
- `
-
- Do not generate a frontend for your backend.
-`,
+ `
+
+ Do not generate a frontend for your backend.
+`
)This adjustment ensures that the option descriptions are properly formatted and consistent with other options.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Generate a frontend for your backend. | |
| `, | |
| ) | |
| .option( | |
| "--no-frontend", | |
| ` | |
| Do not generate a frontend for your backend. | |
| .option( | |
| "--frontend", | |
| ` | |
| Generate a frontend for your backend. | |
| ` | |
| ) | |
| .option( | |
| "--no-frontend", | |
| ` | |
| Do not generate a frontend for your backend. | |
| ` | |
| ) |
| const packageManager = !!options.useNpm | ||
| ? "npm" | ||
| : !!program.usePnpm | ||
| : !!options.usePnpm | ||
| ? "pnpm" | ||
| : !!program.useYarn | ||
| : !!options.useYarn |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify package manager detection logic.
The current implementation uses unnecessary double negation operators. These can be safely removed to improve code clarity without changing the functionality.
Apply the following diff to simplify the package manager detection:
-const packageManager = !!options.useNpm
+const packageManager = options.useNpm
? "npm"
- : !!options.usePnpm
+ : options.usePnpm
? "pnpm"
- : !!options.useYarn
+ : options.useYarn
? "yarn"
: getPkgManager();This change aligns with the static analysis suggestions and makes the code more straightforward.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const packageManager = !!options.useNpm | |
| ? "npm" | |
| : !!program.usePnpm | |
| : !!options.usePnpm | |
| ? "pnpm" | |
| : !!program.useYarn | |
| : !!options.useYarn | |
| const packageManager = options.useNpm | |
| ? "npm" | |
| : options.usePnpm | |
| ? "pnpm" | |
| : options.useYarn | |
| ? "yarn" | |
| : getPkgManager(); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 252-252: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 254-254: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 256-256: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Summary by CodeRabbit