Skip to content

chore: fix incompatible with pydantic #442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

leehuwuj
Copy link
Collaborator

@leehuwuj leehuwuj commented Nov 21, 2024

Ref: run-llama/llama_index#17017

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new dependency on the pydantic library for data validation and settings management in FastAPI projects, with a version constraint of less than 2.10.
  • Chores
    • Updated project dependencies in the pyproject.toml files for FastAPI projects.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 58f6907

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
create-llama Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

A new patch named "create-llama" has been introduced, which sets the Pydantic version to be less than 2.10 to prevent incompatibility issues with the llama-index library. Additionally, the pyproject.toml files for two FastAPI projects have been updated to include a new dependency on the pydantic library, also constrained to a version less than 2.10.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.changeset/breezy-rice-shout.md Introduced "create-llama" patch; set Pydantic version <2.10.
templates/types/extractor/fastapi/pyproject.toml Added pydantic = "<2.10" to dependencies.
templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml Added pydantic = "<2.10" to dependencies.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • marcusschiesser

🐇 In the meadow, hopping free,
A patch was made, oh joy for me!
Pydantic's version, set just right,
With llama-index, all is bright!
Dependencies now align with grace,
In FastAPI, we find our place! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30fe269 and 58f6907.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/breezy-rice-shout.md (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/extractor/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .changeset/breezy-rice-shout.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
templates/types/extractor/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1)

Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.

templates/types/streaming/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1)

Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
templates/types/extractor/fastapi/pyproject.toml (1)

16-16: Consider adding a lower bound to the pydantic version constraint

While setting an upper bound of <2.10 addresses compatibility issues, it's recommended to also set a lower bound to avoid potential issues with very old versions.

-pydantic = "<2.10"
+pydantic = ">=1.10.0,<2.10"

Let's verify the compatibility requirements:

✅ Verification successful

Update pydantic version constraint to align with FastAPI requirements

Based on FastAPI's requirements, we should update the pydantic version constraint to ensure compatibility:

-pydantic = "<2.10"
+pydantic = ">=1.7.4,!=1.8,!=1.8.1,!=2.0.0,!=2.0.1,!=2.1.0,<2.10"

The verification shows that:

  • FastAPI 0.109.1 requires pydantic >=1.7.4,!=1.8,!=1.8.1,!=2.0.0,!=2.0.1,!=2.1.0,<3.0.0
  • llama-index 0.11.1 doesn't have direct pydantic requirements
  • Our suggested constraint aligns with FastAPI's requirements while maintaining the upper bound of <2.10 for any potential llama-index compatibility issues
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check FastAPI's pydantic requirements
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/fastapi/0.109.1/json | jq '.info.requires_dist[] | select(contains("pydantic"))'

# Check llama-index's pydantic requirements
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/llama-index/0.11.1/json | jq '.info.requires_dist[] | select(contains("pydantic"))'

Length of output: 380

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ python = ">=3.11,<3.14"
fastapi = "^0.109.1"
uvicorn = { extras = ["standard"], version = "^0.23.2" }
python-dotenv = "^1.0.0"
pydantic = "<2.10"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update Pydantic version constraint to match FastAPI requirements

The version constraint pydantic = "<2.10" should be updated to match FastAPI's requirements: pydantic>=1.7.4,!=1.8,!=1.8.1,!=2.0.0,!=2.0.1,!=2.1.0,<3.0.0. This ensures compatibility while preventing known problematic versions.

-pydantic = "<2.10"
+# Match FastAPI's Pydantic requirements to ensure compatibility
+pydantic = ">=1.7.4,!=1.8,!=1.8.1,!=2.0.0,!=2.0.1,!=2.1.0,<3.0.0"
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Pydantic version compatibility with FastAPI and llama-index

The addition of pydantic = "<2.10" aligns with the PR objective to fix Pydantic compatibility issues. Let's verify this constraint against the requirements of other dependencies.

Consider adding a comment explaining why this specific version constraint is needed:

-pydantic = "<2.10"
+# Pin Pydantic version to maintain compatibility with llama-index
+pydantic = "<2.10"

Pydantic version constraint needs adjustment for FastAPI compatibility

The current constraint pydantic = "<2.10" is too permissive and might allow incompatible versions. FastAPI 0.109.1 specifically requires pydantic>=1.7.4,!=1.8,!=1.8.1,!=2.0.0,!=2.0.1,!=2.1.0,<3.0.0. Let's verify llama-index's direct Pydantic dependency:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Pydantic version compatibility with FastAPI and llama-index

# Check FastAPI's requirements for Pydantic
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tiangolo/fastapi/0.109.1/pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 "dependencies"

# Check llama-index's requirements for Pydantic
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/run-llama/llama_index/v0.11.17/pyproject.toml | grep -A 10 "dependencies"

Length of output: 2881


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if llama-index-legacy has direct Pydantic requirements
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/run-llama/llama_index_legacy/v0.9.48/pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 "dependencies" | grep pydantic

Length of output: 136

@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser merged commit 8b371d8 into main Nov 21, 2024
46 checks passed
@marcusschiesser marcusschiesser deleted the fix/incompatible-with-pydantic branch November 21, 2024 04:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants