Skip to content

refactor: Cleanup cfg check handling in expression store lowering #19713

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Apr 29, 2025

This was handled fairly inconsistent, which also meant for some parts we wouldn't even show the disabled code diagnostic. This fixes that as well as making things a bit more performant.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 29, 2025
@Veykril Veykril force-pushed the push-xkppskpmuzpo branch from 1747e1a to 443ec83 Compare April 29, 2025 09:37
@Veykril Veykril changed the title refactor: Cleanup cfg check handling in expressiont store lowering refactor: Cleanup cfg check handling in expression store lowering Apr 29, 2025
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Apr 29, 2025

Oh, one commit got squashed into this, but that only forced threads to be named.

@Veykril Veykril force-pushed the push-xkppskpmuzpo branch from 443ec83 to ef44049 Compare April 29, 2025 09:39
@Veykril Veykril enabled auto-merge April 29, 2025 09:39
@Veykril Veykril force-pushed the push-xkppskpmuzpo branch from ef44049 to d11dbf6 Compare April 29, 2025 09:44
@Veykril Veykril added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 29960af Apr 29, 2025
14 checks passed
@Veykril Veykril deleted the push-xkppskpmuzpo branch April 29, 2025 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants