Skip to content

Improve analysis stats legibility #7250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2021
Merged

Improve analysis stats legibility #7250

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2021

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Jan 11, 2021

bors r+
🤖

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jan 11, 2021

@bors bors bot merged commit 52fa926 into rust-lang:master Jan 11, 2021
@matklad matklad deleted the stats branch January 11, 2021 19:39
Veykril pushed a commit to Veykril/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2021
7250: Improve analysis stats legibility r=matklad a=matklad

bors r+
🤖

Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <[email protected]>
eprintln!(
"Expressions of unknown type: {} ({}%)",
" exprs: {}, ??ty: {} ({}%), ?ty: {} ({}%), !ty: {}",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not convinced that this is actually more legible 😄.

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2022
11560: internal: Update `url` to make `webrender` build when computing metrics r=jonas-schievink a=lnicola

Closes #9997

This doesn't seem to affect the metrics, but I'm not sure since somehow I get different values than what shows up on CI.

With `stable`:

```
  exprs: 94151, ??ty: 96 (0%), ?ty: 25 (0%), !ty: 6
```

CI shows 16.

Also, #7250 strikes again, I can never tell what those numbers are.

r? `@jonas-schievink`

Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants