check for .. pattern in redundant_pattern_matching
#10707
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @Manishearth (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Manishearth
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2023
Manishearth
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2023
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
redundant_pattern_matchinglint currently checks forif let Some(_) = ..., but not forif let Some(..) = ....This PR makes sure to also check for the
..pattern in tuple structs.It also found one such instance in clippy itself so that shows it's worth checking for this pattern as well 😅
changelog: [
redundant_pattern_matching]: check for..pattern in tuple structs