Skip to content

makefile: jemalloc is re-built on every make check / make check-stage1 etc #14280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pnkfelix opened this issue May 18, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

makefile: jemalloc is re-built on every make check / make check-stage1 etc #14280

pnkfelix opened this issue May 18, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

jemalloc is being re-built on every make check / make check-stage1 etc.

We manage to avoid doing such rebuilds for libuv and llvm. We should figure out what makefile hacking is necessary to give jemalloc the same treatment.
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

part of #8058

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I think this has since been fixed.

flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2025
@y21
Rename inconsistent_struct_constructor configuration; don't suggest…
d88818d 
… deprecated configurations (rust-lang#14280)

This PR does two things:
- It renames `inconsistent_struct_constructor`'s configuration from
`lint-inconsistent-struct-field-initializers` to
`check-inconsistent-struct-field-initializers`. (I should have suggested
`check-...` in
[rust-lang#13737](rust-lang/rust-clippy#13737 (comment)).)
- It causes Clippy to no longer suggest deprecated configurations.
(Previously, Clippy would suggest `cyclomatic-complexity-threshold`, for
example.)

r? @y21

changelog: Rename `lint-inconsistent-struct-field-initializers` to
`check-inconsistent-struct-field-initializers`
changelog: No longer suggest deprecated configurations
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alexcrichton @pnkfelix