Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Don't repeat lifetime names from outer binder in print #102514
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't repeat lifetime names from outer binder in print #102514
Changes from 2 commits
e1f735a
a8f17e3
e83dcf4
048e637
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's weird, why is this not
we shouldn't replace late-bound regions of inner binders.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(ah, that's whatyou're currently doing inside of
name
. i think it's better to do this here instead)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is that the issue why we're not printing the binder in the
src/test/ui/where-clauses/higher-ranked-fn-type.rs
test?We have both a late-bound region with name
'b
and index 0 and a placeholder with name'b
and index 0.I am not too confident in this code and ideally we stop printing placeholders as if they were bound regions.
@jackh726 do you have an idea how this should work or any expectations for how difficult it is to remove the placeholder hack all-together
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the reason this isn't printed is that we skip the binder in the error reporting code?!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, we shouldn't do that. Either
map_bound
or replace with placeholders. Skipping binders is incorrect for errors as well i think